<p>The regressions are significant (<i>P</i><0.01) level. Only correlation coefficients that are significant at <i>P</i><0.10 level were included. Here <i>T</i><sub>eff</sub> is the mean temperature of the pre-season period that has most negative correlation coefficient (closest to −1) with SOS (see details in section 2.2).</p
<p>Correlograms were calculated by shifting the climatic driver backward one month at a time. The op...
<p>Correlation coefficients (R) between ET and some of the climatic drivers (R<sub>n</sub>, T<sub>a<...
<p>Correlations significant at p < 0.05 are in color, and gray areas indicate insignificant relation...
<p>The regressions are significant (<i>P</i><0.01) level. Only correlation coefficients that are sig...
<p>Spatial distribution of the duration of the pre-season period used to calculate <i>T</i><sub>eff<...
<p>Spatial distribution of the duration of the pre-season period used to calculate <i>T</i><sub>eff<...
<p>Both regressions shown are significant (<i>P</i><0.01). Only pixels with positive change in <i>T<...
<p>All regressions shown are significant (<i>P</i><0.01) ((A) (C) and (E)). The number of pixels in ...
<p>Here <i>T</i><sub>eff</sub> is the mean temperature of the pre-season period that has most negati...
<p>Here <i>T</i><sub>eff</sub> is the mean temperature of the pre-season period that has most negati...
<p>We used the 30-year mean annual temperature to represent the climatic temperature condition. Both...
<p>We used the 30-year mean annual temperature to represent the climatic temperature condition. Both...
<p>Spatial distribution of the rate of change of the SOS from 1982 to 2008 (B). Percentages of negat...
<p>Spatial distribution of the rate of change of the SOS from 1982 to 2008 (B). Percentages of negat...
<p><b>a</b>) correlation coefficient between SOS with average temperature of March and April <b>b</b...
<p>Correlograms were calculated by shifting the climatic driver backward one month at a time. The op...
<p>Correlation coefficients (R) between ET and some of the climatic drivers (R<sub>n</sub>, T<sub>a<...
<p>Correlations significant at p < 0.05 are in color, and gray areas indicate insignificant relation...
<p>The regressions are significant (<i>P</i><0.01) level. Only correlation coefficients that are sig...
<p>Spatial distribution of the duration of the pre-season period used to calculate <i>T</i><sub>eff<...
<p>Spatial distribution of the duration of the pre-season period used to calculate <i>T</i><sub>eff<...
<p>Both regressions shown are significant (<i>P</i><0.01). Only pixels with positive change in <i>T<...
<p>All regressions shown are significant (<i>P</i><0.01) ((A) (C) and (E)). The number of pixels in ...
<p>Here <i>T</i><sub>eff</sub> is the mean temperature of the pre-season period that has most negati...
<p>Here <i>T</i><sub>eff</sub> is the mean temperature of the pre-season period that has most negati...
<p>We used the 30-year mean annual temperature to represent the climatic temperature condition. Both...
<p>We used the 30-year mean annual temperature to represent the climatic temperature condition. Both...
<p>Spatial distribution of the rate of change of the SOS from 1982 to 2008 (B). Percentages of negat...
<p>Spatial distribution of the rate of change of the SOS from 1982 to 2008 (B). Percentages of negat...
<p><b>a</b>) correlation coefficient between SOS with average temperature of March and April <b>b</b...
<p>Correlograms were calculated by shifting the climatic driver backward one month at a time. The op...
<p>Correlation coefficients (R) between ET and some of the climatic drivers (R<sub>n</sub>, T<sub>a<...
<p>Correlations significant at p < 0.05 are in color, and gray areas indicate insignificant relation...