<p>AH headed columns refer to ahistorical comparisons (i.e without phylogenetic corrections), while PC headed columns refer to models with a correction for phylogenetic relatedness. Individual cells in AH and PC columns show Type I error probability estimates (adjusted by Bonferroni correction within test families) or ns when adjusted with P≥0.10. The percentage of trait variation explained by phylogenetic relatedness (Evol) between the species, and ecological preferences (Ecol) in the phylogeny-corrected analysis, are shown. Response (Res) columns show positive (+) or negative (−) relationships between the anatomic trait value and the predictor.</p
<p>Arrows in the left diagram (A) point in the direction of increasing expected values of correspond...
Phylogenetic imputation has recently emerged as a potentially powerful tool for predicting missing d...
<p>In this hypothetical example, eight species have been measured for two traits, x and y, as indica...
<p>Effects of individual predictors (major columns) were assessed separately for intact plants, inju...
Regressions of biological variables across species are rarely perfect. Usually there are residual de...
The primary rationale for the use of phylogenetically based statistical methods is that phylogenetic...
Regressions of biological variables across species are rarely perfect. Usually, there are residual d...
<p>The responses of the numbers of axillary branches and buds and shoots to increasing severity of d...
The discrepancy between theoretical and observed distributions of tree shapes in recent surveys of p...
Phylogenetic regression models for trait evolution incorporate phylogenetic trees for the analysis o...
Abstract.—The discrepancy between theoretical and observed distributions of tree shapes in recent su...
<p>Effects of individual predictors (major columns) were assessed separately for intact plants, inju...
The diversity of plant life histories provides a wealth of raw material for comparative studies on e...
The evolution of continuous traits is the central component of comparative analyses in phylogenetics...
<p>Traits of wild species are means of annual species of same genus. Values are means ± SDs of speci...
<p>Arrows in the left diagram (A) point in the direction of increasing expected values of correspond...
Phylogenetic imputation has recently emerged as a potentially powerful tool for predicting missing d...
<p>In this hypothetical example, eight species have been measured for two traits, x and y, as indica...
<p>Effects of individual predictors (major columns) were assessed separately for intact plants, inju...
Regressions of biological variables across species are rarely perfect. Usually there are residual de...
The primary rationale for the use of phylogenetically based statistical methods is that phylogenetic...
Regressions of biological variables across species are rarely perfect. Usually, there are residual d...
<p>The responses of the numbers of axillary branches and buds and shoots to increasing severity of d...
The discrepancy between theoretical and observed distributions of tree shapes in recent surveys of p...
Phylogenetic regression models for trait evolution incorporate phylogenetic trees for the analysis o...
Abstract.—The discrepancy between theoretical and observed distributions of tree shapes in recent su...
<p>Effects of individual predictors (major columns) were assessed separately for intact plants, inju...
The diversity of plant life histories provides a wealth of raw material for comparative studies on e...
The evolution of continuous traits is the central component of comparative analyses in phylogenetics...
<p>Traits of wild species are means of annual species of same genus. Values are means ± SDs of speci...
<p>Arrows in the left diagram (A) point in the direction of increasing expected values of correspond...
Phylogenetic imputation has recently emerged as a potentially powerful tool for predicting missing d...
<p>In this hypothetical example, eight species have been measured for two traits, x and y, as indica...