<p>Annual CDR for each individual radiologist are shown on this bar graph with performance values and lower bound 95% CI summarized below the bar graph. The fourth bar for each physician represents performance over the 3 years of the study period aggregated (“Agg”) into a consolidated performance metric. Performance values in th first row in italics and bold represent performance values that would be characterized as inadequate using previously published benchmark thresholds.</p
<p>35 patients were grouped into three depth ranges as indicated: 140–200 um, n = 14; 240–270 um, n ...
AimTo retrospectively assess the performance indicators of our radiotherapy department and their tem...
<p>a) mean compression depth of 40-50mm, b) mean compression depth ≥40mm, c) mean compression rate 8...
<p>Plots of (A) CDR and (B) RR for the 4 included radiologists at 6 volumes from 500 examinations (t...
<p>Plots demonstrate our method for constructing curves by using the benchmark threshold as the limi...
Each plot shows the diagnostic measures of the algorithm (purple diamond), micro-average resident ra...
<p>The vertical bars represent the average normalized score for the central hospital in each neighbo...
<p>Performance comparison of many metrics, including CSR, , MML, CH, SI for all algorithms in Leukem...
Mean differences (with 95% CI error bars) in clinical experts’ performance metrics (model-assisted m...
Motivated by the challenges in assessing physician-level cancer screening performance and the negati...
PURPOSE: To determine the management performance indicators most frequently utilized in academic rad...
Motivated by the challenges in assessing physician-level cancer screening performance and the negati...
<p>The threshold for EEG cortical distributions is set 97% at source for each subject. The z score o...
<p>Performance measures comparisons with state-of-the-art CBIR techniques on the Caltech-256 image c...
Performance measures in radiology play an increasingly significant role in health care quality asses...
<p>35 patients were grouped into three depth ranges as indicated: 140–200 um, n = 14; 240–270 um, n ...
AimTo retrospectively assess the performance indicators of our radiotherapy department and their tem...
<p>a) mean compression depth of 40-50mm, b) mean compression depth ≥40mm, c) mean compression rate 8...
<p>Plots of (A) CDR and (B) RR for the 4 included radiologists at 6 volumes from 500 examinations (t...
<p>Plots demonstrate our method for constructing curves by using the benchmark threshold as the limi...
Each plot shows the diagnostic measures of the algorithm (purple diamond), micro-average resident ra...
<p>The vertical bars represent the average normalized score for the central hospital in each neighbo...
<p>Performance comparison of many metrics, including CSR, , MML, CH, SI for all algorithms in Leukem...
Mean differences (with 95% CI error bars) in clinical experts’ performance metrics (model-assisted m...
Motivated by the challenges in assessing physician-level cancer screening performance and the negati...
PURPOSE: To determine the management performance indicators most frequently utilized in academic rad...
Motivated by the challenges in assessing physician-level cancer screening performance and the negati...
<p>The threshold for EEG cortical distributions is set 97% at source for each subject. The z score o...
<p>Performance measures comparisons with state-of-the-art CBIR techniques on the Caltech-256 image c...
Performance measures in radiology play an increasingly significant role in health care quality asses...
<p>35 patients were grouped into three depth ranges as indicated: 140–200 um, n = 14; 240–270 um, n ...
AimTo retrospectively assess the performance indicators of our radiotherapy department and their tem...
<p>a) mean compression depth of 40-50mm, b) mean compression depth ≥40mm, c) mean compression rate 8...