<p>(<b>a</b>) Flowering time measurement of <i>Col</i>, <i>NahG</i>, <i>SUC2<sub>prom</sub>::MYB30</i> and <i>NahG;SUC2<sub>prom</sub>::MYB30</i> under LD conditions. (<b>b</b>) Flowering time measurement of Col, <i>SUC2<sub>prom</sub>::MYB30</i>, <i>flc</i> and <i>SUC2<sub>prom</sub>::MYB30;flc</i> under LD conditions<b>.</b> Statistical significance was determent using one way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by multiple comparison with the Holm-Sidak procedure (p<0.01). Significant differences are indicated by different letters above the bars. The number of plants for each genotype (n) is indicated below the graph.</p
<p>Plants of eleven populations were grown in growth chambers at the indicated day lengths. The firs...
<p>Asterisks indicate significant variation differences between the wild-type and each <i>35S::GhFPF...
<p>Black asterisk indicates marginally statistically significant difference (p = 0.05) between the <...
<p>(<b>a</b>)WT and <i>SUC2<sub>prom</sub>::MYB30</i> expressing Col plants were grown in LDs (16 h ...
a<p>All of the plants are in the same Columbia background and grown under LDs.</p>b<p>Flowering time...
<p><b>(A</b>) Photographs of representative 28 and 39 day-old plants of the Col<sup><i>FLM-Kil</i></...
<p><b>(A)</b> Representative photographs and <b>(B)</b> quantitative flowering time analysis (days t...
<p>Material was collected once per week at ZT16 from WT and <i>SUC2<sub>prom</sub>::MYB30</i> expres...
<p>(A-B) BSA mapping of flowering time in TBG x SWA and BGS x KA F<sub>2</sub>s. Distribution of sin...
<p><sup>a, b</sup>Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05 base...
<p>(<b>A–H</b>) Flowering phenotype of different transgenic lines in long day. Three independent ove...
<p>(A) <i>sft/+ sp</i> plants show slightly delayed primary shoot flowering time compared to <i>sp</...
<p>Accessions were divided into four groups by <i>RFT1</i> haplotypes and <i>Hd1</i> function (funct...
<p>Experiment_1 was carried out in a heated, lit glasshouse with supplementary lighting giving an 18...
<p>(A) Flowering time QTL labeled <i>Ma3, Ma5</i> and <i>Ma6</i>, were identified through analysis o...
<p>Plants of eleven populations were grown in growth chambers at the indicated day lengths. The firs...
<p>Asterisks indicate significant variation differences between the wild-type and each <i>35S::GhFPF...
<p>Black asterisk indicates marginally statistically significant difference (p = 0.05) between the <...
<p>(<b>a</b>)WT and <i>SUC2<sub>prom</sub>::MYB30</i> expressing Col plants were grown in LDs (16 h ...
a<p>All of the plants are in the same Columbia background and grown under LDs.</p>b<p>Flowering time...
<p><b>(A</b>) Photographs of representative 28 and 39 day-old plants of the Col<sup><i>FLM-Kil</i></...
<p><b>(A)</b> Representative photographs and <b>(B)</b> quantitative flowering time analysis (days t...
<p>Material was collected once per week at ZT16 from WT and <i>SUC2<sub>prom</sub>::MYB30</i> expres...
<p>(A-B) BSA mapping of flowering time in TBG x SWA and BGS x KA F<sub>2</sub>s. Distribution of sin...
<p><sup>a, b</sup>Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05 base...
<p>(<b>A–H</b>) Flowering phenotype of different transgenic lines in long day. Three independent ove...
<p>(A) <i>sft/+ sp</i> plants show slightly delayed primary shoot flowering time compared to <i>sp</...
<p>Accessions were divided into four groups by <i>RFT1</i> haplotypes and <i>Hd1</i> function (funct...
<p>Experiment_1 was carried out in a heated, lit glasshouse with supplementary lighting giving an 18...
<p>(A) Flowering time QTL labeled <i>Ma3, Ma5</i> and <i>Ma6</i>, were identified through analysis o...
<p>Plants of eleven populations were grown in growth chambers at the indicated day lengths. The firs...
<p>Asterisks indicate significant variation differences between the wild-type and each <i>35S::GhFPF...
<p>Black asterisk indicates marginally statistically significant difference (p = 0.05) between the <...