<p>(a) , (b) , (c) , (d) the amount of failed edges in cascades as a function of removal fraction for . The inset of (d) shows the densities of three categories edges in all failed edges with the increasing of for . The networks size , and tolerant parameter . Each data point result is obtained by averaging over different realizations. The squares symbol the random attack and the circles symbol the intentional attack. In the inset of Fig. 5(d), the squares, circles and triangles symbol the critical, ordinary and redundant edges respectively. The open symbols and solid symbols represent the amount of edges under random and intentional attack respectively.</p
Given the complexity, size, cost, and importance of network infrastructures like the internet, telec...
<p>Graph presents the mean size of the largest connected component versus the proportion of total no...
Both networks have 5000 nodes and 10000 links. T = B = P = 0.2, and α takes three values: 0.2 (black...
<p>(a) , (b) , (c) , (d) the amount of failed edges in cascades as a function of removal fraction f...
<p>(a) the number of driver nodes at different stages of the cascading failure; (b) the amount of ed...
<p>(a) The number of driver nodes as a function of removal fraction under two attack strategies, (b...
<p>Nodes are targeted by degree (A), leverage (B), betweenness (C), and eigenvector centrality (D), ...
<p>(A) Probability that a single node removal will trigger a cascade as function of the tolerance pa...
We study the controllability of networks in the process of cascading failures under two different at...
Understanding the complex network response to nodes failure is important to protect them and guarant...
<p>(A) Probability that a cascade is triggered for an altruist/preemptively removed fraction . The o...
We study the controllability of networks in the process of cascading failures under two different at...
<p> with represents the generic dimension of controllable subspace after removing a fraction of no...
Many technological networks can experience random and/or systematic failures in their components. Mo...
We study the robustness of networks under node removal, considering random node failure, as well as ...
Given the complexity, size, cost, and importance of network infrastructures like the internet, telec...
<p>Graph presents the mean size of the largest connected component versus the proportion of total no...
Both networks have 5000 nodes and 10000 links. T = B = P = 0.2, and α takes three values: 0.2 (black...
<p>(a) , (b) , (c) , (d) the amount of failed edges in cascades as a function of removal fraction f...
<p>(a) the number of driver nodes at different stages of the cascading failure; (b) the amount of ed...
<p>(a) The number of driver nodes as a function of removal fraction under two attack strategies, (b...
<p>Nodes are targeted by degree (A), leverage (B), betweenness (C), and eigenvector centrality (D), ...
<p>(A) Probability that a single node removal will trigger a cascade as function of the tolerance pa...
We study the controllability of networks in the process of cascading failures under two different at...
Understanding the complex network response to nodes failure is important to protect them and guarant...
<p>(A) Probability that a cascade is triggered for an altruist/preemptively removed fraction . The o...
We study the controllability of networks in the process of cascading failures under two different at...
<p> with represents the generic dimension of controllable subspace after removing a fraction of no...
Many technological networks can experience random and/or systematic failures in their components. Mo...
We study the robustness of networks under node removal, considering random node failure, as well as ...
Given the complexity, size, cost, and importance of network infrastructures like the internet, telec...
<p>Graph presents the mean size of the largest connected component versus the proportion of total no...
Both networks have 5000 nodes and 10000 links. T = B = P = 0.2, and α takes three values: 0.2 (black...