<p>Arrows indicate the direction and magnitude of measurable variables associated with bacterial community structures. Circles and triangles represent different bacterial community structures from the full- and lab-scale bioreactor, respectively. Samples are named with “F” (Full-scale bioreactor) or “L” (Lab-scale bioreactor) and numbers. Sample numbers: 1- May 2010, 2- June 2010, 3-July 2010, 4- August 2010, 5-September 2010, 6- October 2010, 7-November 2010, 8-December 2010, 9-January 2011, 10- February 2011, 11-March 2011, 12-April 2011.</p
<p>Symbols represented the samples from different treatments: cycle (●), original AS; square (■), G1...
<p>Biomarker values were scaled to ⅓ as to fit on the plot. The first two axes explain 44% of the va...
<p>Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) depicting relationships between operational taxonomic uni...
<p>Arrows indicate the direction and magnitude of measurable variables associated with community str...
Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) of the composition of the bacterial community composition in...
<p>Triplot showing the relationship between environmental parameters (nitrate, ammonium, phosphate, ...
<p>Arrows indicate the direction and magnitude of measurable variables associated with AOB community...
<p>Results of canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of environmental variables and bacterial gener...
Microbial phyla are shown as yellow triangles, and muscle FAs are shown as blue arrows. Microbial ph...
<p>Each point represents microbiome of one sample. CCA1 and CCA2 each explained 43.4% and 21.1% of a...
<p>The colored spots represent samples from four different treatments. Each red line represents a va...
CCA constructed from percent abundance data of 28 most abundant species, making up roughly 75% of to...
<p>Triangle represents species with ES50<sub>0.05</sub> of 1–10, circle 10–20, square 20–30. Dark an...
Taxa appropriately explained by the constrained ordination (i.e., >10% of inertia explained by axes ...
<p>Methods are labelled B for Bacterial Enrichment extraction and T for Total DNA extraction.</p
<p>Symbols represented the samples from different treatments: cycle (●), original AS; square (■), G1...
<p>Biomarker values were scaled to ⅓ as to fit on the plot. The first two axes explain 44% of the va...
<p>Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) depicting relationships between operational taxonomic uni...
<p>Arrows indicate the direction and magnitude of measurable variables associated with community str...
Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) of the composition of the bacterial community composition in...
<p>Triplot showing the relationship between environmental parameters (nitrate, ammonium, phosphate, ...
<p>Arrows indicate the direction and magnitude of measurable variables associated with AOB community...
<p>Results of canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of environmental variables and bacterial gener...
Microbial phyla are shown as yellow triangles, and muscle FAs are shown as blue arrows. Microbial ph...
<p>Each point represents microbiome of one sample. CCA1 and CCA2 each explained 43.4% and 21.1% of a...
<p>The colored spots represent samples from four different treatments. Each red line represents a va...
CCA constructed from percent abundance data of 28 most abundant species, making up roughly 75% of to...
<p>Triangle represents species with ES50<sub>0.05</sub> of 1–10, circle 10–20, square 20–30. Dark an...
Taxa appropriately explained by the constrained ordination (i.e., >10% of inertia explained by axes ...
<p>Methods are labelled B for Bacterial Enrichment extraction and T for Total DNA extraction.</p
<p>Symbols represented the samples from different treatments: cycle (●), original AS; square (■), G1...
<p>Biomarker values were scaled to ⅓ as to fit on the plot. The first two axes explain 44% of the va...
<p>Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) depicting relationships between operational taxonomic uni...