<p>Timing accuracy in the cyclic deadline task measured as standard deviation of single trial processing time from the mean processing time in each block and condition.</p
<p>Mean Response Latencies (in milliseconds) and Error Rates (in Percent) with Standard Deviations i...
<p>Characteristics of timing error and time in success zone for each subject.</p
<p>Note. The deadline for the first block of the first session was 2000 ms. In the following session...
<p>All subjects were trained with 85% coherent motion. Time required to reach criterion (80% correct...
<p>Correlation between the timing and counting conditions of the time production task (Pearson’s r =...
<p>Each chronotype showed marked performance decrements at the non-optimal testing time. Vertical ba...
<p>Each circle indicates the data for one subject. The timing error was the absolute difference betw...
<p>Descriptive statistics of accuracy and response time during the Stroop task.</p
<p>Mean Response Latencies (in milliseconds) with Standard Deviations in the Cued Categorization Tas...
<p>Mean Response Latencies (in Milliseconds) and Error rates (in Percent) with Standard Deviations i...
<p>Performance during session one and session two for a) both counting (Pearson’s r = 0.70; <i>p</i>...
<p><b>(A)</b> Mean percentage of trials that were successful or ended in an error or time-out. <b>(B...
<p>Mean values (and standard deviations) of RTs in milliseconds and percentage of correct responses ...
Onset timing accuracy and number of forecasts predicting any onset by predicted onset week.</p
<p>Value of timing error in milliseconds in the target task and in the control task of both the 1Hz-...
<p>Mean Response Latencies (in milliseconds) and Error Rates (in Percent) with Standard Deviations i...
<p>Characteristics of timing error and time in success zone for each subject.</p
<p>Note. The deadline for the first block of the first session was 2000 ms. In the following session...
<p>All subjects were trained with 85% coherent motion. Time required to reach criterion (80% correct...
<p>Correlation between the timing and counting conditions of the time production task (Pearson’s r =...
<p>Each chronotype showed marked performance decrements at the non-optimal testing time. Vertical ba...
<p>Each circle indicates the data for one subject. The timing error was the absolute difference betw...
<p>Descriptive statistics of accuracy and response time during the Stroop task.</p
<p>Mean Response Latencies (in milliseconds) with Standard Deviations in the Cued Categorization Tas...
<p>Mean Response Latencies (in Milliseconds) and Error rates (in Percent) with Standard Deviations i...
<p>Performance during session one and session two for a) both counting (Pearson’s r = 0.70; <i>p</i>...
<p><b>(A)</b> Mean percentage of trials that were successful or ended in an error or time-out. <b>(B...
<p>Mean values (and standard deviations) of RTs in milliseconds and percentage of correct responses ...
Onset timing accuracy and number of forecasts predicting any onset by predicted onset week.</p
<p>Value of timing error in milliseconds in the target task and in the control task of both the 1Hz-...
<p>Mean Response Latencies (in milliseconds) and Error Rates (in Percent) with Standard Deviations i...
<p>Characteristics of timing error and time in success zone for each subject.</p
<p>Note. The deadline for the first block of the first session was 2000 ms. In the following session...
DOI
Add to ORKG