<p>(*) voxel-level threshold p = 0.0001 uncorrected.</p><p>Legend: p(FWE)-cor = cluster-level family-wise error corrected p-values. SVC = small volume corrected. For regions including multiple local maxima, the highest local maximum is reported.</p
<p>Notes: All of the listed brain regions were cluster corrected at 12 contiguous voxels and meet th...
<p>Clusters with significant activation associated with implicit, explicit, or future prediction.</p...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Regional activations related to [FtN, FtS, StN] contrasted to [FW, SW], initial voxel-height thre...
<p>Local maxima employing a voxel-level threshold of <i>p</i>≤0.05, FWE-corrected for multiple compa...
<p>Notes: Only clusters (with local maxima coordinates) up to the threshold of <i>p</i><0.05 correct...
Brain regions with significantly different FC between groups (voxel-level threshold: Uncorrected ppF...
<p>All of the listed brain regions were cluster corrected at 10 contiguous voxels and met the signif...
<p>All activations are significant at p<0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons at the cluster leve...
<p>T-values, cluster sizes and locations of local maxima of activation during AVH in 24 patients, ta...
<p>Regional activations related to FW contrasted to SW. Initial threshold was <i>p</i><0.001 (uncorr...
<p>All x, y, and z values given here represent stereotaxic coordinates according to the coordinate s...
<p>Reported clusters are significant at <i>p</i> < 0.05 (FWE corrected) after applying a whole brain...
<p>(FDR <0.05 combined with cluster level corrected, FWE <0.05).</p><p>Notes: x, y, z indicate the M...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Notes: All of the listed brain regions were cluster corrected at 12 contiguous voxels and meet th...
<p>Clusters with significant activation associated with implicit, explicit, or future prediction.</p...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Regional activations related to [FtN, FtS, StN] contrasted to [FW, SW], initial voxel-height thre...
<p>Local maxima employing a voxel-level threshold of <i>p</i>≤0.05, FWE-corrected for multiple compa...
<p>Notes: Only clusters (with local maxima coordinates) up to the threshold of <i>p</i><0.05 correct...
Brain regions with significantly different FC between groups (voxel-level threshold: Uncorrected ppF...
<p>All of the listed brain regions were cluster corrected at 10 contiguous voxels and met the signif...
<p>All activations are significant at p<0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons at the cluster leve...
<p>T-values, cluster sizes and locations of local maxima of activation during AVH in 24 patients, ta...
<p>Regional activations related to FW contrasted to SW. Initial threshold was <i>p</i><0.001 (uncorr...
<p>All x, y, and z values given here represent stereotaxic coordinates according to the coordinate s...
<p>Reported clusters are significant at <i>p</i> < 0.05 (FWE corrected) after applying a whole brain...
<p>(FDR <0.05 combined with cluster level corrected, FWE <0.05).</p><p>Notes: x, y, z indicate the M...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Notes: All of the listed brain regions were cluster corrected at 12 contiguous voxels and meet th...
<p>Clusters with significant activation associated with implicit, explicit, or future prediction.</p...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
DOI
Add to ORKG