Permanent populism: The Howard government 1996-2007

This article argues that populism was a permanent feature of John Howard’s government and that populism and the associated tactic of wedging were adopted to secure the government’s position and to eliminate populist rivals such as One Nation. Margaret Canovan describes the use of populist techniques by mainstream politicians as politicians’ populism. She also suggests that democracy has both redemptive and pragmatic faces and that when too great a gap opens between democracy’s two faces, populism is likely to emerge. The experience of four terms of the Howard government indicates that when politicians knowingly use populism they can successfully eliminate populist alternatives such as One Nation. The costs for democracy, however, are high, and in the case of the Howard government included neglect of minority rights, the growth of distrust in the institutions of representative democracy, increased community cynicism, the reluctance of the Opposition to speak out on a number of human rights issues for fear of losing support, and opportunistic policy making