<p>The score is derived basing on the length of a protein, total number of predicted contacts and the fraction of satisfied predicted long-range (>23 residues) contacts. The Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) is 0.77.</p
E scoring function was based on the contact data set from the best two predictors (Baker and PROFcon...
Scatter plot of the Log2NSAF by the Log2TPM (A) from all proteins identified by the LC-MS analysis a...
<p>Only the top 7.4% of correlation values were considered. The expected score distribution for all ...
<p>The Spearman correlation coefficient is 0.95, ample proof of agreement on the ranking most of tim...
For each test protein 200 structures were generated by Rosetta. The red ‘+’ sign indicates the avera...
Meff score calculated for each family MSA, the Pcons-score, the TMscore for the proteins with resolv...
<p>The X-axis and Y-axis of each point represent the TM-score of Top1 models selected according to Z...
<p>The upper panels show the fraction of the interaction-based contribution to the log-likelihood of...
<p>Left: The proportion of true contacts in the top <i>N</i>/10 <i>Z</i>(<i>i</i>, <i>j</i>) scores....
Abstract: The number of atom-atom contacts in long distance can fit to the experimental binding ener...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure predicti...
<p>Spearman correlation coefficients (p-value) between baseline Club Cell Protein 16 (CC16), Surfact...
a<p>57 proteins whose optimal Z-score <6.0.</p>b<p>46 proteins whose optimal Z-score > = 6.0.</p>c<p...
<p>The figure shows the long-range contact prediction performance of the top scoring L/5 contacts. D...
E scoring function was based on the contact data set from the best two predictors (Baker and PROFcon...
E scoring function was based on the contact data set from the best two predictors (Baker and PROFcon...
Scatter plot of the Log2NSAF by the Log2TPM (A) from all proteins identified by the LC-MS analysis a...
<p>Only the top 7.4% of correlation values were considered. The expected score distribution for all ...
<p>The Spearman correlation coefficient is 0.95, ample proof of agreement on the ranking most of tim...
For each test protein 200 structures were generated by Rosetta. The red ‘+’ sign indicates the avera...
Meff score calculated for each family MSA, the Pcons-score, the TMscore for the proteins with resolv...
<p>The X-axis and Y-axis of each point represent the TM-score of Top1 models selected according to Z...
<p>The upper panels show the fraction of the interaction-based contribution to the log-likelihood of...
<p>Left: The proportion of true contacts in the top <i>N</i>/10 <i>Z</i>(<i>i</i>, <i>j</i>) scores....
Abstract: The number of atom-atom contacts in long distance can fit to the experimental binding ener...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure predicti...
<p>Spearman correlation coefficients (p-value) between baseline Club Cell Protein 16 (CC16), Surfact...
a<p>57 proteins whose optimal Z-score <6.0.</p>b<p>46 proteins whose optimal Z-score > = 6.0.</p>c<p...
<p>The figure shows the long-range contact prediction performance of the top scoring L/5 contacts. D...
E scoring function was based on the contact data set from the best two predictors (Baker and PROFcon...
E scoring function was based on the contact data set from the best two predictors (Baker and PROFcon...
Scatter plot of the Log2NSAF by the Log2TPM (A) from all proteins identified by the LC-MS analysis a...
<p>Only the top 7.4% of correlation values were considered. The expected score distribution for all ...
DOI
Add to ORKG