<p>Representation of a simulated model nucleus (right) compared to experiment (left).</p
Comparison of the results of simulation experiment 2 for several group structure penalty models.</p
Comparison of our model parameters to parameters in other actomyosin simulation work.</p
<p>Model parameters varied in the simulations with the range of parameter values used in each simula...
<p>Summary of simulation results compared to corresponding experimental results.</p
Representation of the model for assessing longitudinal measurement invariance.</p
<p>The model inputs and output in this experiment with their correlation coefficient and p-values.</...
<p>The different sets of parameter values that was used in the different types of simulations.</p
<p>The weight parameters derived from the comparison of the model simulations and the experimental r...
<p>Schematic representation of a congruent trial in the Arabic digits condition of Experiment 1.</p
<p>Schematic Representation of the experimental design used in this experiment.</p
Comparison of the results of simulation experiment 1 for several group structure penalty models.</p
Visual representation of the model and factor loadings for the one-factor solutions.</p
<p>Conversions between simulated and physical units are discussed in the results section.</p
<p>Representation of the location and orientation changes across the priming conditions in the diffe...
<p>An illustration which demonstrates a test image can be represented by model or by model.</p
Comparison of the results of simulation experiment 2 for several group structure penalty models.</p
Comparison of our model parameters to parameters in other actomyosin simulation work.</p
<p>Model parameters varied in the simulations with the range of parameter values used in each simula...
<p>Summary of simulation results compared to corresponding experimental results.</p
Representation of the model for assessing longitudinal measurement invariance.</p
<p>The model inputs and output in this experiment with their correlation coefficient and p-values.</...
<p>The different sets of parameter values that was used in the different types of simulations.</p
<p>The weight parameters derived from the comparison of the model simulations and the experimental r...
<p>Schematic representation of a congruent trial in the Arabic digits condition of Experiment 1.</p
<p>Schematic Representation of the experimental design used in this experiment.</p
Comparison of the results of simulation experiment 1 for several group structure penalty models.</p
Visual representation of the model and factor loadings for the one-factor solutions.</p
<p>Conversions between simulated and physical units are discussed in the results section.</p
<p>Representation of the location and orientation changes across the priming conditions in the diffe...
<p>An illustration which demonstrates a test image can be represented by model or by model.</p
Comparison of the results of simulation experiment 2 for several group structure penalty models.</p
Comparison of our model parameters to parameters in other actomyosin simulation work.</p
<p>Model parameters varied in the simulations with the range of parameter values used in each simula...
DOI
Add to ORKG