<p>Coherence score was calculated as exponential of the mean log-likelihood of each chromatin code in the hold-out test data, and was normalized by the best model coherence score (hence the 3<sup>rd</sup> order interaction model with regularization and fine tuning has normalized coherence score of 1). Numbers of non-zero parameters for self-energy, pairwise interaction and third-order interactions are shown in parenthesis, in that order.</p
<p>(A) Models are categorized by the type of features they use. Boxes indicate the 25<sup>th</sup> (...
<p>Cumulative distributions of average interaction scores for all 7990 miRNA-3’ UTR combinations pro...
Change in macroscopic synaptic strength (numerical simulations) as a function of the number of pairi...
Bar charts representing the percentage of folds in which each predictor was found to show a positive...
Distribution of number of regulators per target in the B. subtilis prior (A), for the S. cerevisiae ...
a<p>The average rank of lowest energy decoy according to GDT_TS score (over 143 decoy sets) in the a...
<p><b>A</b>) A direct comparison of the percent information captured by and . No cells are sufficie...
Each sub-band represents a range of fluctuation rates. For example, 0-5cpm represents fluctuation ra...
<p>Complete results for the NREM and COX-R models, without and with the gene-generation interactions...
<p><i>A:</i> A schematic illustration of the 4 ROIs used in this study: V1-CE, V1-flanker, V2-CE and...
<p>(A) The distribution of the difference in covariance orientation angle between pairs of elements ...
We represent the number of times a covariate was found on a variant-parameter relationship across al...
The concept of the correlation between two signals is generalized to the correlative coherence of a ...
Contains fulltext : 34968.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)Spectra and cohe...
Calculated the coherence scores using four coherence measures: u_mass (-14,14), c_v (0, 1), c_uci (0...
<p>(A) Models are categorized by the type of features they use. Boxes indicate the 25<sup>th</sup> (...
<p>Cumulative distributions of average interaction scores for all 7990 miRNA-3’ UTR combinations pro...
Change in macroscopic synaptic strength (numerical simulations) as a function of the number of pairi...
Bar charts representing the percentage of folds in which each predictor was found to show a positive...
Distribution of number of regulators per target in the B. subtilis prior (A), for the S. cerevisiae ...
a<p>The average rank of lowest energy decoy according to GDT_TS score (over 143 decoy sets) in the a...
<p><b>A</b>) A direct comparison of the percent information captured by and . No cells are sufficie...
Each sub-band represents a range of fluctuation rates. For example, 0-5cpm represents fluctuation ra...
<p>Complete results for the NREM and COX-R models, without and with the gene-generation interactions...
<p><i>A:</i> A schematic illustration of the 4 ROIs used in this study: V1-CE, V1-flanker, V2-CE and...
<p>(A) The distribution of the difference in covariance orientation angle between pairs of elements ...
We represent the number of times a covariate was found on a variant-parameter relationship across al...
The concept of the correlation between two signals is generalized to the correlative coherence of a ...
Contains fulltext : 34968.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)Spectra and cohe...
Calculated the coherence scores using four coherence measures: u_mass (-14,14), c_v (0, 1), c_uci (0...
<p>(A) Models are categorized by the type of features they use. Boxes indicate the 25<sup>th</sup> (...
<p>Cumulative distributions of average interaction scores for all 7990 miRNA-3’ UTR combinations pro...
Change in macroscopic synaptic strength (numerical simulations) as a function of the number of pairi...