<p>TP: Number of CHF patients detected and TN: number of normal subject detected. FP: Number of normal subject incorrectly labeled as CHF and FN: number of CHF patients incorrectly labeled as normal.</p
<p>N: normal samples; P: CHF patients, in which 1 is of NYHA I-II, 2 is of NYHA III, 3 is of NYHA II...
Number of subjects classified as over the clinical cut-point for each biomarker of hyperglycemia.</p
<p>Performance statistics of the BRAF detection with the four validated assays compared to NGS.</p
Performance metrics of selected algorithms for severe hypoglycemia in patient subgroups (selected al...
<p>Diagnoses of patients in 120-kVp (protocol A) and 80-kVp (protocol B and protocol C).</p
<p>The performance evaluation of classification criteria in 213 patients with suspicious SS.</p
<p>CHW classification of fast and normal breathing compared to expert classification.</p
<p>Frequency distribution of patients according to different GOLD classifications.</p
<p>Comparative analysis of the recognition accuracies of FUO patients with respect to different DANP...
Performance metrics of case-identifying algorithms for severe hypoglycemia (all evaluated algorithms...
<p>Age-standardized prevalence of symptomatic CHF, HFREF and HFNEF (different denominators are due t...
<p>SUM_TD was a nonstandard time domain feature; SUM_FD was a nonstandard frequency domain feature; ...
<p>The number of SNPs in each TMCC prevalence range with a statistically significant different PAF t...
<p>Comparisons of behavioral measurements between the included CP/CPPS-patients and healthy controls...
<p>Diagnostic performance of troponin I for identification of patients needing coronary intervention...
<p>N: normal samples; P: CHF patients, in which 1 is of NYHA I-II, 2 is of NYHA III, 3 is of NYHA II...
Number of subjects classified as over the clinical cut-point for each biomarker of hyperglycemia.</p
<p>Performance statistics of the BRAF detection with the four validated assays compared to NGS.</p
Performance metrics of selected algorithms for severe hypoglycemia in patient subgroups (selected al...
<p>Diagnoses of patients in 120-kVp (protocol A) and 80-kVp (protocol B and protocol C).</p
<p>The performance evaluation of classification criteria in 213 patients with suspicious SS.</p
<p>CHW classification of fast and normal breathing compared to expert classification.</p
<p>Frequency distribution of patients according to different GOLD classifications.</p
<p>Comparative analysis of the recognition accuracies of FUO patients with respect to different DANP...
Performance metrics of case-identifying algorithms for severe hypoglycemia (all evaluated algorithms...
<p>Age-standardized prevalence of symptomatic CHF, HFREF and HFNEF (different denominators are due t...
<p>SUM_TD was a nonstandard time domain feature; SUM_FD was a nonstandard frequency domain feature; ...
<p>The number of SNPs in each TMCC prevalence range with a statistically significant different PAF t...
<p>Comparisons of behavioral measurements between the included CP/CPPS-patients and healthy controls...
<p>Diagnostic performance of troponin I for identification of patients needing coronary intervention...
<p>N: normal samples; P: CHF patients, in which 1 is of NYHA I-II, 2 is of NYHA III, 3 is of NYHA II...
Number of subjects classified as over the clinical cut-point for each biomarker of hyperglycemia.</p
<p>Performance statistics of the BRAF detection with the four validated assays compared to NGS.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG