<p>Table shows the distribution of samples and a comparison study between the automated and the manual scoring. Total number of cases determines the sample size taking into account for the study. The difference of significance was obtained by two-tailed chi-square test resulting into values of <i>P</i><0.0001 (CI = 95%).</p
Scores, that is, ordinal data with few categories, are frequently encountered in practi-cal biopharm...
Comparison of the pre- and post-test total domain scores. Significant differences were observed betw...
Sample sizes for different clinical outcomes based on input and prediction score.</p
<p>The table reports the <i>p</i>-values and corresponding <i>W</i> statistics (in brackets) returne...
Blue (C1) and red (C2) dots are the individual samples; green lines connect samples from individual ...
<p>The entries in cells indicate that the two systems are significantly different in F-scores. CD ha...
<p>Notation: M1-manual segmentation-1, M2-manual segmentation-2, M-average of M1 and M2, P-proposed,...
<p>C: combination, R: ratio, N/A: non applicable.</p><p>*: statistically significant difference (chi...
The green check mark in the upper right corner indicates that the corresponding method was used for ...
<p>Mean (± standard errors) or proportions are given for each variable among cases and controls. A c...
<p>Among the 18 protein targets used as testcases, those for which the rankings by both scoring func...
This article reviews a number of statistical tests for comparing proportions. These statistical test...
<p>(A) Pearson’s correlation coefficients in the continuous analysis were compared to fold-changes i...
<p> values are grouped by linguistic phylum with each dot representing one population. The median pe...
‡<p>chi-square test;</p>†<p>, paired t-test for unequal distribution,</p>*<p>proportions.</p
Scores, that is, ordinal data with few categories, are frequently encountered in practi-cal biopharm...
Comparison of the pre- and post-test total domain scores. Significant differences were observed betw...
Sample sizes for different clinical outcomes based on input and prediction score.</p
<p>The table reports the <i>p</i>-values and corresponding <i>W</i> statistics (in brackets) returne...
Blue (C1) and red (C2) dots are the individual samples; green lines connect samples from individual ...
<p>The entries in cells indicate that the two systems are significantly different in F-scores. CD ha...
<p>Notation: M1-manual segmentation-1, M2-manual segmentation-2, M-average of M1 and M2, P-proposed,...
<p>C: combination, R: ratio, N/A: non applicable.</p><p>*: statistically significant difference (chi...
The green check mark in the upper right corner indicates that the corresponding method was used for ...
<p>Mean (± standard errors) or proportions are given for each variable among cases and controls. A c...
<p>Among the 18 protein targets used as testcases, those for which the rankings by both scoring func...
This article reviews a number of statistical tests for comparing proportions. These statistical test...
<p>(A) Pearson’s correlation coefficients in the continuous analysis were compared to fold-changes i...
<p> values are grouped by linguistic phylum with each dot representing one population. The median pe...
‡<p>chi-square test;</p>†<p>, paired t-test for unequal distribution,</p>*<p>proportions.</p
Scores, that is, ordinal data with few categories, are frequently encountered in practi-cal biopharm...
Comparison of the pre- and post-test total domain scores. Significant differences were observed betw...
Sample sizes for different clinical outcomes based on input and prediction score.</p