[A]<p>Includes only percent of surgical observations with total score ( = 1 point). Items receiving a partial score ( = 0.5 point) during observation were not counted as correctly done.</p>[B]<p>Includes only facilities with no missing items. Thus, the sum of percentages does not equal zero.</p>*<p>Denotes statistically significant at p<0.05.</p
A: Percentage of patients undergoing scheduled surgical vs. non-surgical BVFP treatment and of patie...
<p>Post-operative adverse effects for the second year of the VMMC pilot are shown ranked by grade. N...
Importance: The existing readmission quality metric does not meaningfully distinguish readmissions a...
[A]<p>Includes only percent of surgical observations with total score ( = 1 point). Items receiving ...
[A]<p>Includes only percent of facilities with total score ( = 1 point). Items receiving a partial s...
<p>Descriptive statistics on four surgical efficiency elements and the quality score for VMMC proced...
Objective: Evaluation of surgical quality ensures consistency of care and facilitates improvements i...
*<p>Eight sites were visited by external supervisory teams shortly after the SYMMACS data collection...
Aim: A fair to moderate concordance in grading of the total mesorectal excision (TME) surgical speci...
Background: The rapid expansion of voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) has raised concerns wh...
OBJECTIVE: To identify, on the basis of past performance, those hospitals that demonstrate good outc...
OBJECTIVE: To identify, on the basis of past performance, those hospitals that demonstrate good outc...
Aim: A fair to moderate concordance in grading of the total mesorectal excision (TME) surgical speci...
AIM: A fair to moderate concordance in grading of the total mesorectal excision (TME) surgical speci...
To identify, on the basis of past performance, those hospitals that demonstrate good outcomes in suf...
A: Percentage of patients undergoing scheduled surgical vs. non-surgical BVFP treatment and of patie...
<p>Post-operative adverse effects for the second year of the VMMC pilot are shown ranked by grade. N...
Importance: The existing readmission quality metric does not meaningfully distinguish readmissions a...
[A]<p>Includes only percent of surgical observations with total score ( = 1 point). Items receiving ...
[A]<p>Includes only percent of facilities with total score ( = 1 point). Items receiving a partial s...
<p>Descriptive statistics on four surgical efficiency elements and the quality score for VMMC proced...
Objective: Evaluation of surgical quality ensures consistency of care and facilitates improvements i...
*<p>Eight sites were visited by external supervisory teams shortly after the SYMMACS data collection...
Aim: A fair to moderate concordance in grading of the total mesorectal excision (TME) surgical speci...
Background: The rapid expansion of voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) has raised concerns wh...
OBJECTIVE: To identify, on the basis of past performance, those hospitals that demonstrate good outc...
OBJECTIVE: To identify, on the basis of past performance, those hospitals that demonstrate good outc...
Aim: A fair to moderate concordance in grading of the total mesorectal excision (TME) surgical speci...
AIM: A fair to moderate concordance in grading of the total mesorectal excision (TME) surgical speci...
To identify, on the basis of past performance, those hospitals that demonstrate good outcomes in suf...
A: Percentage of patients undergoing scheduled surgical vs. non-surgical BVFP treatment and of patie...
<p>Post-operative adverse effects for the second year of the VMMC pilot are shown ranked by grade. N...
Importance: The existing readmission quality metric does not meaningfully distinguish readmissions a...