<p>The possible combinations for sets of cues and targets were six: No cue congruent (NC-C), No cue incongruent (NC-I), Central cue congruent (CC-C), Central cue incongruent (CC-I), Spatial cue congruent (SC-C) and Spatial cue incongruent (SC-I).</p
<p>(a) different congruency conditions (instructed participant direction×stimulus direction). (b) Il...
AbstractWe studied the contribution of multiple cues to figure–ground segregation. Convexity, symmet...
<p>During a variable interval (VI = 400–1600 ms), a central fixation cross is presented and the part...
<p>(A) Possible locations for cues and targets; (B) Congruant trial; (C) Incongruent trial; (D) Tria...
<p>Examples of stimuli in the four experimental conditions: monocular cue, normal, congruent (retina...
<p>A. A flowchart of an individual trial. In this example, the visual spatial cue indicates spatial ...
<p>Participants were randomly assigned to one of the stimulus sets.</p><p>Four sets of unique incong...
<p>A distractor appeared above or below fixation at random and was either the same as (compatible) o...
<p>Mean RT (+ SE, in ms) was compared for each cueing condition (congruent, incongruent, control) fo...
<p><b>A.</b> A 5×7 array of annuli and a fixation cross were presented at all times. Rhythmic cueing...
<p>Group averaged accuracies for target discrimination at congruent and incongruent locations as a f...
<p>A pre-cue condition appeared for 67 msec. Conditions a) no cue and b) dual cues of a single lumin...
<p>A distractor appeared either above or below center at random followed by a central target, which ...
(a) Targets configuration; (b) Trial sequence. Subjects performed 15-target center-out and center-in...
<p>The stimuli are not drawn to scale. In this illustrated experimental trial the cue is presented 4...
<p>(a) different congruency conditions (instructed participant direction×stimulus direction). (b) Il...
AbstractWe studied the contribution of multiple cues to figure–ground segregation. Convexity, symmet...
<p>During a variable interval (VI = 400–1600 ms), a central fixation cross is presented and the part...
<p>(A) Possible locations for cues and targets; (B) Congruant trial; (C) Incongruent trial; (D) Tria...
<p>Examples of stimuli in the four experimental conditions: monocular cue, normal, congruent (retina...
<p>A. A flowchart of an individual trial. In this example, the visual spatial cue indicates spatial ...
<p>Participants were randomly assigned to one of the stimulus sets.</p><p>Four sets of unique incong...
<p>A distractor appeared above or below fixation at random and was either the same as (compatible) o...
<p>Mean RT (+ SE, in ms) was compared for each cueing condition (congruent, incongruent, control) fo...
<p><b>A.</b> A 5×7 array of annuli and a fixation cross were presented at all times. Rhythmic cueing...
<p>Group averaged accuracies for target discrimination at congruent and incongruent locations as a f...
<p>A pre-cue condition appeared for 67 msec. Conditions a) no cue and b) dual cues of a single lumin...
<p>A distractor appeared either above or below center at random followed by a central target, which ...
(a) Targets configuration; (b) Trial sequence. Subjects performed 15-target center-out and center-in...
<p>The stimuli are not drawn to scale. In this illustrated experimental trial the cue is presented 4...
<p>(a) different congruency conditions (instructed participant direction×stimulus direction). (b) Il...
AbstractWe studied the contribution of multiple cues to figure–ground segregation. Convexity, symmet...
<p>During a variable interval (VI = 400–1600 ms), a central fixation cross is presented and the part...