<p>+ Similar finding or similar trend in current study to previous study. – Different finding or different trend in current study to previous study. +/− Consistent with previous work.</p><p>*Trend to significance (≤0.08).</p>†<p>Statistical differences between individual normalized gene expression values not reported in original study.</p
<p>(<b>a</b>) Description of our analysis with respect to the differential expression analyses in (H...
<p>* Threshold of significance set at P<0.05</p><p>Correlation analysis between gene expression leve...
<p><b>A.</b> Correlation analysis of the average of FPKM under eight conditions for each sample. <b>...
<p>Comparison of mean (±SE) normalized expression levels per biological sample (20–30 pooled polyps)...
<p>Fold changes are expressed as the ratio of gene expression between XGC and YRC after normalizatio...
<p>*Means at the end of the end of the study that were significantly different (P<0.05) compared to ...
Comparison of Differentially Expressed Genes in This Study and Previously Published Datasets.</p
<p>(A) Gene expression analysis among <u>promastigotes</u>: PRO constant...
<p>Multiple ANOVA results, giving fold changes, showing that mean expression was significantly lower...
<p>Bland-Altman plots were produced using microarray data from one GHS individual to evaluate agreem...
Summary statistics for case/control expression differences in whole blood for genes identified in DN...
<p>All the analyzed genes showed significant differences among the different stages according to Kru...
<p>Mean expression values shown. Students t-test used to test for significance (p<0.05). Expression ...
<p>(A) Average normalized ribosomal gene signature expression values in patients with or without a h...
<p>Mean expression values shown. Students t-test used to test for significance (p<0.05). Expression ...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Description of our analysis with respect to the differential expression analyses in (H...
<p>* Threshold of significance set at P<0.05</p><p>Correlation analysis between gene expression leve...
<p><b>A.</b> Correlation analysis of the average of FPKM under eight conditions for each sample. <b>...
<p>Comparison of mean (±SE) normalized expression levels per biological sample (20–30 pooled polyps)...
<p>Fold changes are expressed as the ratio of gene expression between XGC and YRC after normalizatio...
<p>*Means at the end of the end of the study that were significantly different (P<0.05) compared to ...
Comparison of Differentially Expressed Genes in This Study and Previously Published Datasets.</p
<p>(A) Gene expression analysis among <u>promastigotes</u>: PRO constant...
<p>Multiple ANOVA results, giving fold changes, showing that mean expression was significantly lower...
<p>Bland-Altman plots were produced using microarray data from one GHS individual to evaluate agreem...
Summary statistics for case/control expression differences in whole blood for genes identified in DN...
<p>All the analyzed genes showed significant differences among the different stages according to Kru...
<p>Mean expression values shown. Students t-test used to test for significance (p<0.05). Expression ...
<p>(A) Average normalized ribosomal gene signature expression values in patients with or without a h...
<p>Mean expression values shown. Students t-test used to test for significance (p<0.05). Expression ...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Description of our analysis with respect to the differential expression analyses in (H...
<p>* Threshold of significance set at P<0.05</p><p>Correlation analysis between gene expression leve...
<p><b>A.</b> Correlation analysis of the average of FPKM under eight conditions for each sample. <b>...