<p>(A) Overall % accuracy for all different trials. (B) Nameability advantage (easier-to-name trials minus harder-to-name trials). A positive difference score indicates an advantage on easier-to-name trials; a negative score indicates a disadvantage on easier-to-name trials. Error bars represent 1SE of the mean difference between easier-to-name and harder-to-name trials.</p
Tests of accuracy in interpersonal perception take many forms. Often, such tests use designs and sco...
Comparison of accuracy for different approaches, where small value indicates good performance and bo...
<p>a) In Exp. 1, responses were faster on validly cued trials, compared to invalidly cued trials. b)...
<p>(A) Overall % accuracy for all different trials. (B) Nameability advantage (easier-to-name trials...
(A) Accuracy scores for no (gray bars) vs. high (black bars) value distractor trials both in no vs. ...
(A) Accuracy scores for no (gray bars) vs. high (black bars) value distractor trials both in no vs. ...
(A) Accuracy scores for no (gray bars) vs. high (black bars) value distractor trials both in no vs. ...
a) Difference scores (in percent of trials) for which feature of a pair was looked at first. Differe...
<p>T1 and T2 accuracy as a function of current lag (trial n, 2 vs. 8), previous lag (trial n-1, 2 vs...
Mean percentage of trials where subjects selected the risky option for Experiment 1 (solid line) and...
<p>Gray bar: results from Experiment 1 where there was no central fixation task. Recognition accurac...
<p>(a) GO trial accuracy. I.e. pressing the space bar when required to do so. (b) Percentage of comm...
<p>T2 accuracy as a function of current lag (trial n, 2 vs. 8), previous lag (trial n-1, 2 vs. 8 vs....
<p>(Left) On average, Go stimuli took significantly longer to learn than No Go stimuli. (Right) Erro...
<p>Bars show grand average behavioural accuracy as percentage correct (A) and grand average response...
Tests of accuracy in interpersonal perception take many forms. Often, such tests use designs and sco...
Comparison of accuracy for different approaches, where small value indicates good performance and bo...
<p>a) In Exp. 1, responses were faster on validly cued trials, compared to invalidly cued trials. b)...
<p>(A) Overall % accuracy for all different trials. (B) Nameability advantage (easier-to-name trials...
(A) Accuracy scores for no (gray bars) vs. high (black bars) value distractor trials both in no vs. ...
(A) Accuracy scores for no (gray bars) vs. high (black bars) value distractor trials both in no vs. ...
(A) Accuracy scores for no (gray bars) vs. high (black bars) value distractor trials both in no vs. ...
a) Difference scores (in percent of trials) for which feature of a pair was looked at first. Differe...
<p>T1 and T2 accuracy as a function of current lag (trial n, 2 vs. 8), previous lag (trial n-1, 2 vs...
Mean percentage of trials where subjects selected the risky option for Experiment 1 (solid line) and...
<p>Gray bar: results from Experiment 1 where there was no central fixation task. Recognition accurac...
<p>(a) GO trial accuracy. I.e. pressing the space bar when required to do so. (b) Percentage of comm...
<p>T2 accuracy as a function of current lag (trial n, 2 vs. 8), previous lag (trial n-1, 2 vs. 8 vs....
<p>(Left) On average, Go stimuli took significantly longer to learn than No Go stimuli. (Right) Erro...
<p>Bars show grand average behavioural accuracy as percentage correct (A) and grand average response...
Tests of accuracy in interpersonal perception take many forms. Often, such tests use designs and sco...
Comparison of accuracy for different approaches, where small value indicates good performance and bo...
<p>a) In Exp. 1, responses were faster on validly cued trials, compared to invalidly cued trials. b)...