<p>Mean (and SE) percentage composition of major taxonomic groups. Samples pooled in each location (n = number of locations averaged).</p
Patterns of latitudinal variation on relative abundance of taxa after BVSTEP routine. The data per l...
a<p>Difference between natural sediment and enrichment populations. +, OTU has greater representatio...
<p>Diversity, abundance and dominance for Casey and McMurdo infaunal communities. Note that a differ...
<p>Phylogenetic community composition of microcosms. Relative abundance (%) of detected classes.</p
<p>F, full gut; S, starved; Ac, <i>Acartia</i>; Ce, <i>Centropages</i>; Ca, <i>Calanus</i>. <i>Acart...
<p>The reduplicate data at each scale consisting of the 5 total explained variations of the 5 DBH cl...
<p>Species composition of the initial community (n = 1) and at the end of the experiment (% of total...
<p>Cumulative contribution (%) of each taxon to the between-group dissimilarities is provided (90% c...
<p>The mean +/−1 s.e. are denoted (significant Tukey post hoc contrasts denoted by different letters...
Biodiversity values for the samples used in the study (A) Shannon distribution and (B) Simpson distr...
<p>Microbial community composition as a percentage of the top 20 most abundant taxa present in three...
<p>Relative proportions of polychaetes and crustaceans in infaunal assemblages at Casey and McMurdo,...
<p>Local (mean α) and regional (γ) components are expressed as equivalent number of species (mean±SD...
<p><b>A</b>: Percentage of sequences for each taxonomic group found per sampling point with the COI ...
<p>Random subsets have the same genus richness as the predetermined indicator taxon under comparison...
Patterns of latitudinal variation on relative abundance of taxa after BVSTEP routine. The data per l...
a<p>Difference between natural sediment and enrichment populations. +, OTU has greater representatio...
<p>Diversity, abundance and dominance for Casey and McMurdo infaunal communities. Note that a differ...
<p>Phylogenetic community composition of microcosms. Relative abundance (%) of detected classes.</p
<p>F, full gut; S, starved; Ac, <i>Acartia</i>; Ce, <i>Centropages</i>; Ca, <i>Calanus</i>. <i>Acart...
<p>The reduplicate data at each scale consisting of the 5 total explained variations of the 5 DBH cl...
<p>Species composition of the initial community (n = 1) and at the end of the experiment (% of total...
<p>Cumulative contribution (%) of each taxon to the between-group dissimilarities is provided (90% c...
<p>The mean +/−1 s.e. are denoted (significant Tukey post hoc contrasts denoted by different letters...
Biodiversity values for the samples used in the study (A) Shannon distribution and (B) Simpson distr...
<p>Microbial community composition as a percentage of the top 20 most abundant taxa present in three...
<p>Relative proportions of polychaetes and crustaceans in infaunal assemblages at Casey and McMurdo,...
<p>Local (mean α) and regional (γ) components are expressed as equivalent number of species (mean±SD...
<p><b>A</b>: Percentage of sequences for each taxonomic group found per sampling point with the COI ...
<p>Random subsets have the same genus richness as the predetermined indicator taxon under comparison...
Patterns of latitudinal variation on relative abundance of taxa after BVSTEP routine. The data per l...
a<p>Difference between natural sediment and enrichment populations. +, OTU has greater representatio...
<p>Diversity, abundance and dominance for Casey and McMurdo infaunal communities. Note that a differ...
DOI
Add to ORKG