<p>The numerical results of averaged percent error in LF/HF ratio (% error LHR) produced by all the three methods for each data-truncation case (up to 10% and 20% data losses, respectively).</p
Averaging of the fQRS complexes and T/QRS calculation of a) recording r01, which achieved high accur...
<p>Average values of Accuracy, Kappa and imbalance ratio (min/maj) for the two methods in experiment...
<p>Comparison of proportion of errors due to each type of error for unsatisfactory results at study ...
<p>The numerical results of averaged PEP produced by all the three methods for each data-truncation ...
Percentage of predicted FLI+ values with lower absolute error compared to original computed FLI.</p
<p>This figure shows the percentage of errors present in major statistical methods in the years 2003...
<p>Numerical summary of predictions overall and across several covariates by prediction error (km) a...
<p>The average recognition rates (%) and standard deviations (%) of different algorithms on LFW data...
<p>(A) Percentage of correct responses and coefficients of variation as a function of condition and ...
<p>results of the linear regressions for error rates (in %) using the product of the operands as ind...
<p>Percentage of correct matches from (A) the human assessment and (B) the computational method.</p
<p>Percentage (%) of data points where the prediction method error was greater than 0.01%, for varyi...
<p>The classification errors (CE)%, the mean absolute errors (MAE) in degree of the proposed techniq...
<p>The L2 error and the CPU time associated with the four numerical methods discussed in this paper....
The summary statistics of accuracy after running 2-folds, 4-folds, 10-folds, and LOSO 100 times.</p
Averaging of the fQRS complexes and T/QRS calculation of a) recording r01, which achieved high accur...
<p>Average values of Accuracy, Kappa and imbalance ratio (min/maj) for the two methods in experiment...
<p>Comparison of proportion of errors due to each type of error for unsatisfactory results at study ...
<p>The numerical results of averaged PEP produced by all the three methods for each data-truncation ...
Percentage of predicted FLI+ values with lower absolute error compared to original computed FLI.</p
<p>This figure shows the percentage of errors present in major statistical methods in the years 2003...
<p>Numerical summary of predictions overall and across several covariates by prediction error (km) a...
<p>The average recognition rates (%) and standard deviations (%) of different algorithms on LFW data...
<p>(A) Percentage of correct responses and coefficients of variation as a function of condition and ...
<p>results of the linear regressions for error rates (in %) using the product of the operands as ind...
<p>Percentage of correct matches from (A) the human assessment and (B) the computational method.</p
<p>Percentage (%) of data points where the prediction method error was greater than 0.01%, for varyi...
<p>The classification errors (CE)%, the mean absolute errors (MAE) in degree of the proposed techniq...
<p>The L2 error and the CPU time associated with the four numerical methods discussed in this paper....
The summary statistics of accuracy after running 2-folds, 4-folds, 10-folds, and LOSO 100 times.</p
Averaging of the fQRS complexes and T/QRS calculation of a) recording r01, which achieved high accur...
<p>Average values of Accuracy, Kappa and imbalance ratio (min/maj) for the two methods in experiment...
<p>Comparison of proportion of errors due to each type of error for unsatisfactory results at study ...
DOI
Add to ORKG