<p>Ordinations were performed with square-root transformed abundance in the OTU vs. site matrix. Final stress value for the 2-dimensional NMDS solution was 0.03062. Variables with |<i>r|</i> ≥0.5 values are shown in bold and are displayed in the NMDS ordinations in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0099852#pone-0099852-g003" target="_blank">Figure 3</a>.</p
<p>Significance level:<sup> NS</sup> Non-significant (P>0.05), *P<0.05, **P<0.01 (n = 12).</p
<p>Pearson's correlation coefficients for model variables. Coefficients shown in bold represent sign...
<p>*, Pearson correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.</p><p>**, Pearson correlation is signifi...
Pearson correlation matrix for the NMDS axes shown in Fig 3 and species composition.</p
R-squared values for the correlations between abiotic and biotic variables, including functional tra...
<p>Only traits exhibiting significant associations with at least one axis are listed. Values in bold...
<p>Relationship between the NMDS scores (derived on only one axis) and the percentage of pioneer ste...
<p>** Correlations are significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)</p><p>* Correlation is significant a...
The strongest response variables are highlighted in bold type, where r > 0.5 or < -0.5.</p
Edge sites are represented by squares and in-forest sites by circles. Sites sampled at neap tide are...
<p>Analyses generated from Bray Curtis dissimilarity plus a dummy variable (+d) on Hellinger-transfo...
<p>NA indicates that the taxon represented less than 1% of all individuals collected in either cages...
<p>Species abundances were log (x+1) transformed and an ordination was performed with the Bray-Curti...
<p>Two-dimensional NMDS solution: (A) NMDS 1 vs. NMDS 2; (B) NMDS 1 vs. latitude; and (C) NMDS 2 vs....
Stress = 0.193; k = 2; non-metric fit R2 = 0.963. Dots represent individual desman samples and colou...
<p>Significance level:<sup> NS</sup> Non-significant (P>0.05), *P<0.05, **P<0.01 (n = 12).</p
<p>Pearson's correlation coefficients for model variables. Coefficients shown in bold represent sign...
<p>*, Pearson correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.</p><p>**, Pearson correlation is signifi...
Pearson correlation matrix for the NMDS axes shown in Fig 3 and species composition.</p
R-squared values for the correlations between abiotic and biotic variables, including functional tra...
<p>Only traits exhibiting significant associations with at least one axis are listed. Values in bold...
<p>Relationship between the NMDS scores (derived on only one axis) and the percentage of pioneer ste...
<p>** Correlations are significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)</p><p>* Correlation is significant a...
The strongest response variables are highlighted in bold type, where r > 0.5 or < -0.5.</p
Edge sites are represented by squares and in-forest sites by circles. Sites sampled at neap tide are...
<p>Analyses generated from Bray Curtis dissimilarity plus a dummy variable (+d) on Hellinger-transfo...
<p>NA indicates that the taxon represented less than 1% of all individuals collected in either cages...
<p>Species abundances were log (x+1) transformed and an ordination was performed with the Bray-Curti...
<p>Two-dimensional NMDS solution: (A) NMDS 1 vs. NMDS 2; (B) NMDS 1 vs. latitude; and (C) NMDS 2 vs....
Stress = 0.193; k = 2; non-metric fit R2 = 0.963. Dots represent individual desman samples and colou...
<p>Significance level:<sup> NS</sup> Non-significant (P>0.05), *P<0.05, **P<0.01 (n = 12).</p
<p>Pearson's correlation coefficients for model variables. Coefficients shown in bold represent sign...
<p>*, Pearson correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.</p><p>**, Pearson correlation is signifi...