Probe tests.

<p>Among rats that underwent 1 day of training, rats in the HFS group exhibited a significant increase in latency (<b>AB</b>) and path length (<b>CD</b>) to the target location across consecutive probe tests, whereas rats in the control group exhibited no change across probe tests. HFS did not affect number of target crosses (<b>EF</b>), time spent in the target zone (<b>GH</b>), or time spent in the target quadrant (<b>IJ</b>). Among rats that underwent 4 days of training, HFS rats spent less time in the target zone than control rats during both probe tests (<b>QR</b>). Also, rats in the reactivation group exhibited short latency (<b>L</b>) and path length (<b>N</b>) during both probe tests, whereas rats in the no reactivation group exhibited a significant increase in latency (<b>K</b>) and path length (<b>M</b>) across consecutive probe tests. Rats in the reactivation group also spent more time in the target zone and target quadrant during both probe tests (<b>RT</b>) compared to rats in the no reactivation group (<b>QS</b>). Neither HFS nor reactivation affected number of target crosses (<b>OP</b>). * denotes main effect of probe test within HFS group (collapsed across reactivation/no reactivation groups), <i>p</i><.05.). # denotes main effect of HFS (collapsed across reactivation/no reactivation groups and probe tests), <i>p</i><.05. £ denotes main effect of probe test (collapsed across HFS/control and reactivation/no reactivation groups), <i>p</i><.05. § denotes main effect of probe test within no reactivation group (collapsed across HFS/control groups), <i>p</i><.05. ¥ denotes main effect of reactivation (collapsed across HFS/control groups and probe tests), <i>p</i><.05.