<p>Ratios with 95% confidence intervals that did not include 1 indicated selection (>1) or avoidance (<1) of particular habitat types. Significant results are shown in bold. Second order selection compared habitat use in individual MCP ranges to availability in the population range; third order selection compared habitat use in the utilisation distributions to availability in the individual MCPs.</p
Model selection results for predicting 3rd quartile species richness based on minimum temperature, v...
A) Total area covered by the high suitability predictions by time interval. B) Percentage of habitat...
<p>Species-specific variations in modeled habitat use for May, July, and September months (2004–2011...
<p>Significant results are shown in bold. Second order selection compared habitat use in individual ...
The selection ratio (SR), i.e. the ratio of proportional use of a habitat over proportional availabi...
<p>In the compositional analysis a positive (negative) sign in pairs of habitats marks the preferenc...
<p>The table shows the selection ratios when considering the habitat as a six-level factor (all wet ...
<p>Jacobs preference indices and Bailey's confidence intervals were calculated [<a href="http://www....
International audienceResource selection functions (RSFs) can be used to map suitable habitat of a s...
<p>Multi-species high-use foraging areas across months and years (2004–2011); each gradient represen...
1.If animals moved randomly in space, the use of different habitats would be proportional to their a...
<p>Figure shows the mean of distance ratios of habitat types (indicated as di_habitat type) with 95%...
<p>Species-specific habitat use across months and years (2004–2011); each gradient represents a 10% ...
<p>Proportion of predicted habitat (higher values indicate more suitable) in relation to different s...
Model selection results for predicting 2nd quartile species richness based on minimum temperature, v...
Model selection results for predicting 3rd quartile species richness based on minimum temperature, v...
A) Total area covered by the high suitability predictions by time interval. B) Percentage of habitat...
<p>Species-specific variations in modeled habitat use for May, July, and September months (2004–2011...
<p>Significant results are shown in bold. Second order selection compared habitat use in individual ...
The selection ratio (SR), i.e. the ratio of proportional use of a habitat over proportional availabi...
<p>In the compositional analysis a positive (negative) sign in pairs of habitats marks the preferenc...
<p>The table shows the selection ratios when considering the habitat as a six-level factor (all wet ...
<p>Jacobs preference indices and Bailey's confidence intervals were calculated [<a href="http://www....
International audienceResource selection functions (RSFs) can be used to map suitable habitat of a s...
<p>Multi-species high-use foraging areas across months and years (2004–2011); each gradient represen...
1.If animals moved randomly in space, the use of different habitats would be proportional to their a...
<p>Figure shows the mean of distance ratios of habitat types (indicated as di_habitat type) with 95%...
<p>Species-specific habitat use across months and years (2004–2011); each gradient represents a 10% ...
<p>Proportion of predicted habitat (higher values indicate more suitable) in relation to different s...
Model selection results for predicting 2nd quartile species richness based on minimum temperature, v...
Model selection results for predicting 3rd quartile species richness based on minimum temperature, v...
A) Total area covered by the high suitability predictions by time interval. B) Percentage of habitat...
<p>Species-specific variations in modeled habitat use for May, July, and September months (2004–2011...