<p>C- control group, D – diabetic group, SbT – Sb treated group, CSbnpT – CSbnp treated group. Results were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). <sup>$</sup>P<0.05 significant difference compared with D group.</p
<p>Light microscopy 200×. Diabetic mice were treated with BPs (30 and 60 mg/kg/day), glyburide (7.2 ...
<p>Note: Value are mean ± SD,</p>*<p><i>P</i><0.05,</p>**<p><i>P</i><0.01 <i>vs</i> CON;</p>#<p><i>P...
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of liver glycogen loading on net hepatic glyco...
<p>Results expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6).</p>φ<p>P<0.01 significant difference compared with D grou...
<p>Results expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6).</p>≠<p>P<1.0 no significant difference compared with D gr...
<p>Results expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6).</p><p>*P<0.001 highly significant difference compared wit...
<p>Results expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6).</p>≠<p>P<1.0 no significant difference compared with D gr...
<p>C- control group, D – diabetic group, SbT – Sb treated group, CSbnpT – CSbnp treated group.</p
<p>C- control group, D – diabetic group, SbT – Sb treated group, CSbnpT – CSbnp treated group. Resul...
<p>C – control group, D – diabetic group, SbT – Sb treated group, CSbnpT – CSbnp treated group. Resu...
<p>C – control group, D – diabetic group, SbT – Sb treated group, CSbnpT – CSbnp treated group. Resu...
<p>A) Blood glucose (mM) plotted as function of time. At t = 0 min. the animals were dosed sc. with ...
<p>Effect of BBR and BC-HDD NPs on high glucose induced change in SOD activity. (<b>B</b>) Effect of...
(A) Liver mass, (B) Liver fat, and (C) Liver glycogen. N = 8/group. ap ≤ 0.05 vs. Sed-ST; bp ≤ 0.05 ...
<p>Values are Mean ± S.D. (n = 6), ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspart...
<p>Light microscopy 200×. Diabetic mice were treated with BPs (30 and 60 mg/kg/day), glyburide (7.2 ...
<p>Note: Value are mean ± SD,</p>*<p><i>P</i><0.05,</p>**<p><i>P</i><0.01 <i>vs</i> CON;</p>#<p><i>P...
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of liver glycogen loading on net hepatic glyco...
<p>Results expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6).</p>φ<p>P<0.01 significant difference compared with D grou...
<p>Results expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6).</p>≠<p>P<1.0 no significant difference compared with D gr...
<p>Results expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6).</p><p>*P<0.001 highly significant difference compared wit...
<p>Results expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6).</p>≠<p>P<1.0 no significant difference compared with D gr...
<p>C- control group, D – diabetic group, SbT – Sb treated group, CSbnpT – CSbnp treated group.</p
<p>C- control group, D – diabetic group, SbT – Sb treated group, CSbnpT – CSbnp treated group. Resul...
<p>C – control group, D – diabetic group, SbT – Sb treated group, CSbnpT – CSbnp treated group. Resu...
<p>C – control group, D – diabetic group, SbT – Sb treated group, CSbnpT – CSbnp treated group. Resu...
<p>A) Blood glucose (mM) plotted as function of time. At t = 0 min. the animals were dosed sc. with ...
<p>Effect of BBR and BC-HDD NPs on high glucose induced change in SOD activity. (<b>B</b>) Effect of...
(A) Liver mass, (B) Liver fat, and (C) Liver glycogen. N = 8/group. ap ≤ 0.05 vs. Sed-ST; bp ≤ 0.05 ...
<p>Values are Mean ± S.D. (n = 6), ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspart...
<p>Light microscopy 200×. Diabetic mice were treated with BPs (30 and 60 mg/kg/day), glyburide (7.2 ...
<p>Note: Value are mean ± SD,</p>*<p><i>P</i><0.05,</p>**<p><i>P</i><0.01 <i>vs</i> CON;</p>#<p><i>P...
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of liver glycogen loading on net hepatic glyco...
DOI
Add to ORKG