Association of XPF scoring by pathologist scores versus machine assisted image analysis and quantitation.
- Tanguy Y. Seiwert (186349)
- XiaoZhe Wang (597609)
- Jana Heitmann (597610)
- Vivian Villegas-Bergazzi (597611)
- Kam Sprott (597612)
- Stephen Finn (202541)
- Esther O'Regan (263740)
- Allan D. Farrow (597613)
- Ralph R. Weichselbaum (113294)
- Mark W. Lingen (250859)
- Ezra E. W. Cohen (186351)
- Kerstin Stenson (597614)
- David T. Weaver (597615)
- Everett E. Vokes (253949)
Publication date
July 2014
DOIAbstract
<p>Comparisons are made between alternative scoring strategies for immunohistochemistry with the XPF for each head and neck cancer patient. Machine assisted scoring for XPF was determined based on percentage of nuclei with 1+ (weak), 2+ (medium), 3+ (high) intensity Pathologist scores were Intensity (I). Correlation plots as shown are computed for similarity with an R-value of 0.79.</p
Add to ORKG