<p>Rarefaction analysis was performed using the de-noised 454 pyrotag sequencing data on <i>de novo</i> picked OTUs for (<b>A</b>) A-horizon and (<b>B</b>) clay samples. Each curve is the average from experimental replicates (N = 2 libraries for the 2001 method and ORNL 2012 method A-horizon samples; N = 3 libraries for the remainder of the sample/method combinations) from 100 jackknife iterations over each sampling depth. The key for the A-horizon comparison of accessed diversity uses the same color code as for the clay sample comparison.</p
<p>Observed number of OTUs for different sequencing and analysis methods: A. SA <i>rrn</i>. B. IM <i...
<p>Sequences from each sample were randomly sub-sampled to the lowest number of sequences contained ...
<p>A) LSU clones rarefaction curves analyses, cutoffs = 0.03, 0.05, 0.10, respectively; B) ITS clone...
<p>a) Rarefaction curves are depicted at 3%, 5% and 10% dissimilarity level; b) Rank-abundances show...
<p>At each sampling depth, the average number of OTUs is shown (n=2) (a) Different primer pairs (b) ...
<p>Note the overlap of curves for F1, F3, F5 (top); W1, W3, W5 (middle); L1, L2 (bottom). Panel A co...
<p>The rarefaction curve, plotting the number of observed OTUs (sharing ≥97% identity) as a function...
At each sampling depth 10 random samples were taken, and the distribution of Sequence Variant number...
<p>The number of observed OTUs in the MC is shown as the function of the number of 3730 (A) and 454 ...
<p>(A) Left axis: Clustering of OTUs (as % of total OTUs) according to the number of supporting read...
<p>Rarefaction curves representing the numbers of Operational Taxonomic Units (OTU) <i>versus</i> th...
<p>Venn diagrams representing the combined OTUs accessed using experimental replicate extractions fr...
<p>A) Rarefaction curves with singletons included. B) Rarefaction curves with singletons excluded. T...
Rarefaction curves of OTUs clustered at 97% sequence identity across the sample. The sample labeled ...
<p>Each soil is represented by color and pattern. Rarefaction analysis focuses on discovery of novel...
<p>Observed number of OTUs for different sequencing and analysis methods: A. SA <i>rrn</i>. B. IM <i...
<p>Sequences from each sample were randomly sub-sampled to the lowest number of sequences contained ...
<p>A) LSU clones rarefaction curves analyses, cutoffs = 0.03, 0.05, 0.10, respectively; B) ITS clone...
<p>a) Rarefaction curves are depicted at 3%, 5% and 10% dissimilarity level; b) Rank-abundances show...
<p>At each sampling depth, the average number of OTUs is shown (n=2) (a) Different primer pairs (b) ...
<p>Note the overlap of curves for F1, F3, F5 (top); W1, W3, W5 (middle); L1, L2 (bottom). Panel A co...
<p>The rarefaction curve, plotting the number of observed OTUs (sharing ≥97% identity) as a function...
At each sampling depth 10 random samples were taken, and the distribution of Sequence Variant number...
<p>The number of observed OTUs in the MC is shown as the function of the number of 3730 (A) and 454 ...
<p>(A) Left axis: Clustering of OTUs (as % of total OTUs) according to the number of supporting read...
<p>Rarefaction curves representing the numbers of Operational Taxonomic Units (OTU) <i>versus</i> th...
<p>Venn diagrams representing the combined OTUs accessed using experimental replicate extractions fr...
<p>A) Rarefaction curves with singletons included. B) Rarefaction curves with singletons excluded. T...
Rarefaction curves of OTUs clustered at 97% sequence identity across the sample. The sample labeled ...
<p>Each soil is represented by color and pattern. Rarefaction analysis focuses on discovery of novel...
<p>Observed number of OTUs for different sequencing and analysis methods: A. SA <i>rrn</i>. B. IM <i...
<p>Sequences from each sample were randomly sub-sampled to the lowest number of sequences contained ...
<p>A) LSU clones rarefaction curves analyses, cutoffs = 0.03, 0.05, 0.10, respectively; B) ITS clone...