<p>The winning, dominant male either had a higher aggression score compared to the losing, subordinate male (Dom>Sub, black column), the same aggression score (Dom = Sub, grey column) or a lower score (Dom</p
<p>(a) The grey circles represent the observed residual body masses. The black dots represent the me...
contains data on dominance rank and aggression rates in adult, paired greylag geese and all relevant...
How animals decide to withdraw from contests is central to understand the evolution of fighting beha...
Many factors can affect the probability for an individual to obtain a high social rank, including si...
<p>Spearman rank correlation coefficients (r) are shown.</p><p>*denotes significance at the <i>p</i>...
<p>The scores range from 0 to 6 (6 being highest). Males with a crouched body posture and dropped wi...
The ability to dominate conspecifics and thereby gain access to resources depends on a number of tra...
Individuals in social species commonly form dominance relationships, where dominant individuals enjo...
<p>A, B Pictograms illustrating the paradigms “winning without fighting” and respectively “fighting ...
<div><p>Individuals in social species commonly form dominance relationships, where dominant individu...
The ability to dominate conspecifics and thereby gain access to resources depends on a number of tra...
<p>Sex class combinations are: ff (females attacking female), fm (female attacking male), mf (male a...
<p>The figure shows the number of tested pairs in which either the early stressed or the control bir...
<p>The four most common male fighting behaviours are performed at different rates by defenders compa...
<p>A comparison of aggression levels between pairs of females with either matching or non-matching l...
<p>(a) The grey circles represent the observed residual body masses. The black dots represent the me...
contains data on dominance rank and aggression rates in adult, paired greylag geese and all relevant...
How animals decide to withdraw from contests is central to understand the evolution of fighting beha...
Many factors can affect the probability for an individual to obtain a high social rank, including si...
<p>Spearman rank correlation coefficients (r) are shown.</p><p>*denotes significance at the <i>p</i>...
<p>The scores range from 0 to 6 (6 being highest). Males with a crouched body posture and dropped wi...
The ability to dominate conspecifics and thereby gain access to resources depends on a number of tra...
Individuals in social species commonly form dominance relationships, where dominant individuals enjo...
<p>A, B Pictograms illustrating the paradigms “winning without fighting” and respectively “fighting ...
<div><p>Individuals in social species commonly form dominance relationships, where dominant individu...
The ability to dominate conspecifics and thereby gain access to resources depends on a number of tra...
<p>Sex class combinations are: ff (females attacking female), fm (female attacking male), mf (male a...
<p>The figure shows the number of tested pairs in which either the early stressed or the control bir...
<p>The four most common male fighting behaviours are performed at different rates by defenders compa...
<p>A comparison of aggression levels between pairs of females with either matching or non-matching l...
<p>(a) The grey circles represent the observed residual body masses. The black dots represent the me...
contains data on dominance rank and aggression rates in adult, paired greylag geese and all relevant...
How animals decide to withdraw from contests is central to understand the evolution of fighting beha...
DOI
Add to ORKG