<p>(Top row): correlation bar plots of the most predictive metrics of species richness by guild. White bars represent a positive correlation and grey indicate a negative correlation. (Bottom rows): correlation comparisons between comparable patch-based metrics with and without considering the vertical patches and edges for the woodland and forest edge guild. The left panels show traditional metrics without accounting for height-heterogeneity; the right panels are height-structured counterparts. The black dots indicate a negative correlation and the grey ones indicate a positive correlation.</p
<p>ANOVAs comparing mean abundance per habitat within guilds are all significant with at least p<0.0...
<p>Taxonomic classes of <i>Bacteria</i> (gray italics), Fungi (black) and <i>Archaea</i> (black ital...
Panel A shows the summary tables for each pairwise comparison (0 = no detection, 1 = positive detect...
<p>Black indicates species of same foraging guild; red indicates species of different foraging guild...
<p>(Top row): Modeled vs. actual species richness for three guilds using all-inclusive random forest...
<p>Solid lines represent positive correlations; dashed lines depict negative correlations. Line thic...
<p>Solid lines represent positive correlations while dotted lines denote negative correlations. Fung...
<p>Upper panels (a) show the response in total number of connected cells and lower panels (b) show t...
Spearman correlation between the three aspects of species spatial behavior (years pooled): Aggregati...
<p>Panel A is for Gutianshan (GT) vs. Dinghushan (DH). Panel B is for Xishuangbanna (BN) vs. Dinghus...
<p>The contours show common levels of correlation coefficient; black contours indicate positive corr...
<p>Correlations between rank-scores given by habitat specialists to 12 examples of EUNIS class F4 (T...
<p>These stacked bar plots help to compare the low abundant taxonomic units, which may be difficult ...
<p>Box-plots showing characteristic types of distributions of guilds on different tree species. Abbr...
<p>(a) Major data sets (estimated species richness with ten protocols, observed species richness wit...
<p>ANOVAs comparing mean abundance per habitat within guilds are all significant with at least p<0.0...
<p>Taxonomic classes of <i>Bacteria</i> (gray italics), Fungi (black) and <i>Archaea</i> (black ital...
Panel A shows the summary tables for each pairwise comparison (0 = no detection, 1 = positive detect...
<p>Black indicates species of same foraging guild; red indicates species of different foraging guild...
<p>(Top row): Modeled vs. actual species richness for three guilds using all-inclusive random forest...
<p>Solid lines represent positive correlations; dashed lines depict negative correlations. Line thic...
<p>Solid lines represent positive correlations while dotted lines denote negative correlations. Fung...
<p>Upper panels (a) show the response in total number of connected cells and lower panels (b) show t...
Spearman correlation between the three aspects of species spatial behavior (years pooled): Aggregati...
<p>Panel A is for Gutianshan (GT) vs. Dinghushan (DH). Panel B is for Xishuangbanna (BN) vs. Dinghus...
<p>The contours show common levels of correlation coefficient; black contours indicate positive corr...
<p>Correlations between rank-scores given by habitat specialists to 12 examples of EUNIS class F4 (T...
<p>These stacked bar plots help to compare the low abundant taxonomic units, which may be difficult ...
<p>Box-plots showing characteristic types of distributions of guilds on different tree species. Abbr...
<p>(a) Major data sets (estimated species richness with ten protocols, observed species richness wit...
<p>ANOVAs comparing mean abundance per habitat within guilds are all significant with at least p<0.0...
<p>Taxonomic classes of <i>Bacteria</i> (gray italics), Fungi (black) and <i>Archaea</i> (black ital...
Panel A shows the summary tables for each pairwise comparison (0 = no detection, 1 = positive detect...