<p>The Weber Fraction is calculated by dividing the discrimination threshold by the reference distance. The bars show the mean over participants and the error bars show the standard error of the mean over participants. The Weber fraction for 15 cm is slightly larger than the fractions for 25 and 35 cm. * (Bonferroni-corrected )</p
Since more than 15 years, researchers have been expressing their interest in evaluating the Approxim...
<p>Performance of the numerosity task under the three experimental conditions (single task (black), ...
<p>The mean RTs and accuracy of all participants as a function of numerical notation and distance.</...
<p>In all the previous figures the Weber fraction was a fixed parameter obtained from subjects’ accu...
<p>Weber Fraction's mean and standard error for each task and for each paradigm.</p
<p>Dots reflect predicted accuracy for a Weber fraction of 0.1 (i.e., more accurate ANS, depicted in...
<p>(A) Example participantMDJ Weber Fraction values for unisensory and, multisensory conditions and ...
<p>Mean and standard deviation of Weber fractions for musicians and nonmusicians for each perceptual...
Since more than 15 years, researchers have been expressing their interest in evaluating the Approxim...
<p>Numbers in parenthesis indicate the Weber fraction between reference and comparison numbers.</p
AbstractFactors underlying Weber's law for position were investigated by measuring spatial interval ...
<p>(A) Example participantMDJ's unisensory psychometric functions for the three audio noise levels a...
<p>M. = Mean; S.E.M. = Standard Error of Mean; BP = Bisection Point; WR = Weber Ratio.</p
Since more than 15 years, researchers have been expressing their interest in evaluating the Approxim...
<p>Left Panel: Proportion correct averaged across individuals for each degree difference between ref...
Since more than 15 years, researchers have been expressing their interest in evaluating the Approxim...
<p>Performance of the numerosity task under the three experimental conditions (single task (black), ...
<p>The mean RTs and accuracy of all participants as a function of numerical notation and distance.</...
<p>In all the previous figures the Weber fraction was a fixed parameter obtained from subjects’ accu...
<p>Weber Fraction's mean and standard error for each task and for each paradigm.</p
<p>Dots reflect predicted accuracy for a Weber fraction of 0.1 (i.e., more accurate ANS, depicted in...
<p>(A) Example participantMDJ Weber Fraction values for unisensory and, multisensory conditions and ...
<p>Mean and standard deviation of Weber fractions for musicians and nonmusicians for each perceptual...
Since more than 15 years, researchers have been expressing their interest in evaluating the Approxim...
<p>Numbers in parenthesis indicate the Weber fraction between reference and comparison numbers.</p
AbstractFactors underlying Weber's law for position were investigated by measuring spatial interval ...
<p>(A) Example participantMDJ's unisensory psychometric functions for the three audio noise levels a...
<p>M. = Mean; S.E.M. = Standard Error of Mean; BP = Bisection Point; WR = Weber Ratio.</p
Since more than 15 years, researchers have been expressing their interest in evaluating the Approxim...
<p>Left Panel: Proportion correct averaged across individuals for each degree difference between ref...
Since more than 15 years, researchers have been expressing their interest in evaluating the Approxim...
<p>Performance of the numerosity task under the three experimental conditions (single task (black), ...
<p>The mean RTs and accuracy of all participants as a function of numerical notation and distance.</...