Formal evaluation of the ability of clinicians and researchers to agree, for example, on the clinical assessment of patients, increasingly is becoming important. Two measures of agreement, ? and the intraclass correlation coefficient, are described and illustrated. The calculation of confidence intervals that correspond to these statistics by means of the 'bootstrap' method also is discussed
Evaluation of various methods in clinical practice is often based on interpretations by two or more ...
Abstract:Kappa statistics is used for the assessment of agreement between two or more raters when th...
In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often n...
With advances in medical technology, simpler and safer methods for diagnosis and therapy are increas...
Correlation and agreement are 2 concepts that are widely applied in the medical literature and clini...
Interrater agreement on binary measurements is usually assessed via Scott's π or Cohen's κ, which ar...
This classic methods paper (Bland and Altman, 2010) considers the assessment of agreement between me...
Agreement between fixed observers or methods that produce readings on a continuous scale is usually ...
In medicine, before replacing an old device by a new one, we need to know whether the results of the...
AbstractAgreement measures are used frequently in reliability studies that involve categorical data....
<p>n = Total number of studies retrieved for each specialty, x = number of studies.</p
Agreement between measurements refers to the degree of concordance between two (or more) sets of mea...
<p>n = Total number of studies retrieved, x = number of studies, % = percentage.</p
In this study, we have further extended the methodology proposed, first, by Lin et al. (2002) and, l...
Background: Currently, we are not aware of a method to assess graphically on one simple plot agreeme...
Evaluation of various methods in clinical practice is often based on interpretations by two or more ...
Abstract:Kappa statistics is used for the assessment of agreement between two or more raters when th...
In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often n...
With advances in medical technology, simpler and safer methods for diagnosis and therapy are increas...
Correlation and agreement are 2 concepts that are widely applied in the medical literature and clini...
Interrater agreement on binary measurements is usually assessed via Scott's π or Cohen's κ, which ar...
This classic methods paper (Bland and Altman, 2010) considers the assessment of agreement between me...
Agreement between fixed observers or methods that produce readings on a continuous scale is usually ...
In medicine, before replacing an old device by a new one, we need to know whether the results of the...
AbstractAgreement measures are used frequently in reliability studies that involve categorical data....
<p>n = Total number of studies retrieved for each specialty, x = number of studies.</p
Agreement between measurements refers to the degree of concordance between two (or more) sets of mea...
<p>n = Total number of studies retrieved, x = number of studies, % = percentage.</p
In this study, we have further extended the methodology proposed, first, by Lin et al. (2002) and, l...
Background: Currently, we are not aware of a method to assess graphically on one simple plot agreeme...
Evaluation of various methods in clinical practice is often based on interpretations by two or more ...
Abstract:Kappa statistics is used for the assessment of agreement between two or more raters when th...
In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often n...