<p>Summary of methodological quality of studies according to Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool concerning risk of bias and applicability in review authors’ judgments about each domain for each included study and review authors’ judgments about each domain, presented as percentages across included studies.</p
<p>Summary of the methodological quality assessment of the reviewed studies according to the 14 QUAD...
<p>The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool for quality assessment of...
*<p>Whiting P, Rutjes A, Reitsma J, Bossuyt P, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the...
<p>(a) Risk of bias and applicability concerns graph: review authors’ judgements about each domain p...
<p>Data was carried out using a bar graph showing the percentages of the 16 studies that met the cri...
<p>Our judgements for each methodological quality item are presented as percentages for all included...
<p>Methodological quality graph summarizing the risk of bias from all included studies.</p
<p>Our judgements for each methodological quality item for all individual studies.</p
<p>Methodological quality of included studies according to the revised quality assessment for studie...
<p>3A) Methodological quality graph: authors’ judgment about each methodological quality item presen...
Risk of bias and applicability concerns graph: Review authors’ judgments about each domain presented...
Methodological quality and risk of bias for validity studies according to the QUADAS-2 scale.</p
(A) Domain-specific quality assessment graph. (B) Detailed quality assessment summary.</p
<p>The methodological quality assessments of studies included in the meta-analysis, the vertical coo...
<p>Summary of variables included in the QUADAS-2 tool assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy s...
<p>Summary of the methodological quality assessment of the reviewed studies according to the 14 QUAD...
<p>The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool for quality assessment of...
*<p>Whiting P, Rutjes A, Reitsma J, Bossuyt P, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the...
<p>(a) Risk of bias and applicability concerns graph: review authors’ judgements about each domain p...
<p>Data was carried out using a bar graph showing the percentages of the 16 studies that met the cri...
<p>Our judgements for each methodological quality item are presented as percentages for all included...
<p>Methodological quality graph summarizing the risk of bias from all included studies.</p
<p>Our judgements for each methodological quality item for all individual studies.</p
<p>Methodological quality of included studies according to the revised quality assessment for studie...
<p>3A) Methodological quality graph: authors’ judgment about each methodological quality item presen...
Risk of bias and applicability concerns graph: Review authors’ judgments about each domain presented...
Methodological quality and risk of bias for validity studies according to the QUADAS-2 scale.</p
(A) Domain-specific quality assessment graph. (B) Detailed quality assessment summary.</p
<p>The methodological quality assessments of studies included in the meta-analysis, the vertical coo...
<p>Summary of variables included in the QUADAS-2 tool assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy s...
<p>Summary of the methodological quality assessment of the reviewed studies according to the 14 QUAD...
<p>The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool for quality assessment of...
*<p>Whiting P, Rutjes A, Reitsma J, Bossuyt P, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the...
DOI
Add to ORKG