<p>Across participants' mean performance accuracy (SEM indicated) for each condition in the visual discrimination task for the monetary (black) and picture conditioning paradigm (gray). Asterisks indicate significant differences between rewarded and neutral sound condition, * <i>p</i><0.01. See main text.</p
<p>Shows absolute performance and the impact of task difficulty in the two age-groups during the sem...
<p>A. Hit and false alarm rates for discrimination learning. Different experimental runs were aligne...
Is visual awareness graded or binary? Experimental work has provided support for both possibilities,...
<p>Across participants' mean response times (SEM indicated) for each condition in the visual discrim...
<p>Scenes (black), face (stripe) and dots (white) refer to the nature of the stimulus, whilst Interm...
<p>Bars show grand average behavioural accuracy as percentage correct (A) and grand average response...
<p>The dashed line represents chance level, which was 50% for both tasks. The left panels (a, c) sho...
<p>81.25% and above marks a performance above chance (dotted line). Asterisks mark significant diffe...
<p>Measures of performance accuracy (percent correct), sensitivity (d'), and response bias (β) in th...
<p>(A) Monetary conditioning phase. On each trial, participants responded to the brief presentation ...
<p>Mean discrimination performance across subjects for the five vocalizations types (A-E) against al...
<p>Bars represent mean reaction times with color singleton present (dark bars) and absent (light bar...
<p>Error bars represent the confidence intervals surrounding the means (CI = 95%). For both tasks, p...
<p>A) Average threshold hue angles are shown for each condition, averaged over reference hue for the...
<p>Behavioral accuracy for judging which eye saw the grating stimulus is plotted for the low and hig...
<p>Shows absolute performance and the impact of task difficulty in the two age-groups during the sem...
<p>A. Hit and false alarm rates for discrimination learning. Different experimental runs were aligne...
Is visual awareness graded or binary? Experimental work has provided support for both possibilities,...
<p>Across participants' mean response times (SEM indicated) for each condition in the visual discrim...
<p>Scenes (black), face (stripe) and dots (white) refer to the nature of the stimulus, whilst Interm...
<p>Bars show grand average behavioural accuracy as percentage correct (A) and grand average response...
<p>The dashed line represents chance level, which was 50% for both tasks. The left panels (a, c) sho...
<p>81.25% and above marks a performance above chance (dotted line). Asterisks mark significant diffe...
<p>Measures of performance accuracy (percent correct), sensitivity (d'), and response bias (β) in th...
<p>(A) Monetary conditioning phase. On each trial, participants responded to the brief presentation ...
<p>Mean discrimination performance across subjects for the five vocalizations types (A-E) against al...
<p>Bars represent mean reaction times with color singleton present (dark bars) and absent (light bar...
<p>Error bars represent the confidence intervals surrounding the means (CI = 95%). For both tasks, p...
<p>A) Average threshold hue angles are shown for each condition, averaged over reference hue for the...
<p>Behavioral accuracy for judging which eye saw the grating stimulus is plotted for the low and hig...
<p>Shows absolute performance and the impact of task difficulty in the two age-groups during the sem...
<p>A. Hit and false alarm rates for discrimination learning. Different experimental runs were aligne...
Is visual awareness graded or binary? Experimental work has provided support for both possibilities,...
DOI
Add to ORKG