<p>Microsaccades were sorted into bins for pre- and post-tests for each group. Within participant standard error of the means are shown and paired t-tests were used to analyze the distribution at each bin. (A) Pre-stimulus data show no significant difference between pre- and post-tests. Data during the stimulus period shows no significant difference in microsaccade amplitude except at 0.8 amplitude in the SOP group (B). This difference was only significant at α = 0.05 prior to multiple comparisons correction but was consistent with the microsaccade suppression hypothesis.</p
<p>The PRE and D1 values are represented. <sup>*</sup> indicates significant differences between PRE...
<p>Since only Male /na/ training continuum was used in this experiment, Trained, Gen. Syllable, Gen....
<p>(<b>a</b>) Accuracy was lower in trials with novel sounds in comparison to those with standard so...
<p>Participants were designated as high-risk or low-risk based on initial UFOV scores. Pre-test micr...
<p>(<i>A</i>) Rates of microsaccades during sustained fixation and during reading. The asterisk mark...
<p>A. Performance in letter discrimination as a function of delay with respect to microsaccade onset...
<p>(A) Pairwise comparison of suppression indexes. Black lines in histograms represent the median. T...
<p>(A) Group mean thresholds for training. Solid lines are least squares logarithmic fits. Error bar...
<p>Comparison of changes in the BD between the pre- and post-tests in two Training Resistance Groups...
<p>A: Signal-to-noise ratio <i>S</i>, dots correspond to pairs of stimuli. Value from observed covar...
<p>Test items are coded based on what the participant was trained. For example, if a participant was...
<p>Correction for the number of comparisons gives a significance level of 0.016. In the last 2 colum...
<p>Learning is shown as the difference between pre- and post-test thresholds. Individual z-scores we...
<p>Scatter plots for microsaccade magnitude (<b>A</b>), displacement (<b>B</b>), overshoot size (<b>...
<p>Just as in Experiment 1B, Trained, Gen. Syllable, Gen. Gender and Gen. Syllable & Gender test ite...
<p>The PRE and D1 values are represented. <sup>*</sup> indicates significant differences between PRE...
<p>Since only Male /na/ training continuum was used in this experiment, Trained, Gen. Syllable, Gen....
<p>(<b>a</b>) Accuracy was lower in trials with novel sounds in comparison to those with standard so...
<p>Participants were designated as high-risk or low-risk based on initial UFOV scores. Pre-test micr...
<p>(<i>A</i>) Rates of microsaccades during sustained fixation and during reading. The asterisk mark...
<p>A. Performance in letter discrimination as a function of delay with respect to microsaccade onset...
<p>(A) Pairwise comparison of suppression indexes. Black lines in histograms represent the median. T...
<p>(A) Group mean thresholds for training. Solid lines are least squares logarithmic fits. Error bar...
<p>Comparison of changes in the BD between the pre- and post-tests in two Training Resistance Groups...
<p>A: Signal-to-noise ratio <i>S</i>, dots correspond to pairs of stimuli. Value from observed covar...
<p>Test items are coded based on what the participant was trained. For example, if a participant was...
<p>Correction for the number of comparisons gives a significance level of 0.016. In the last 2 colum...
<p>Learning is shown as the difference between pre- and post-test thresholds. Individual z-scores we...
<p>Scatter plots for microsaccade magnitude (<b>A</b>), displacement (<b>B</b>), overshoot size (<b>...
<p>Just as in Experiment 1B, Trained, Gen. Syllable, Gen. Gender and Gen. Syllable & Gender test ite...
<p>The PRE and D1 values are represented. <sup>*</sup> indicates significant differences between PRE...
<p>Since only Male /na/ training continuum was used in this experiment, Trained, Gen. Syllable, Gen....
<p>(<b>a</b>) Accuracy was lower in trials with novel sounds in comparison to those with standard so...