<p>Relationships between mean EMG activity and peak acceleration (A–B) and between mean EMG activity and EMG onset latency (C–D) over the three temporal windows. The regression plots (B–D) are reported only for the correlations displaying a level of significance with <i>p</i><0.05. Each data point results from the average computed in each subject over ten trials performed during predictable (P) and unpredictable (U) conditions regardless of the load level. ** <i>p</i><0.01; * <i>p</i><0.05; ns: not significant.</p
a<p>male recipients only.</p><p>Shown is the Spearman correlation coefficient. Dependent variable: p...
<p>(A) Gamma power (70–90 Hz) during 50 consecutive trials. EMG onsets are aligned at t = 0. Each tr...
<p>Symbols represent the mean for each subject across 5 experimental sessions. A: There was no relat...
<p>ATE, absolute temporal error; U, unchanged condition; DV, decreased velocity; Latency, latency ti...
<p>Mean EMG<sub>rms</sub> (EMG<sub>mean</sub>), peak EMG<sub>rms</sub> (EMG<sub>peak</sub>) and rate...
<p>Mean level of baseline activity (A) and its variability (B) recorded over 100 ms prior the moveme...
<p>Correlations were calculated for the whole duration of the trial (including both vibration and po...
<p>Distribution of EMG latency (A–C) and principal components waveforms (D–E) over the interval of t...
<p>The simple linear regression of the rate of torque development (RTD) predicted by the rate of rat...
The correlation between the acceleration signals and the ECG signal at different lags.</p
<p>In the figure the mean correlation value and its standard deviation are shown for each considered...
<p>Data are mean ± SD for 12 subjects. Note that there was no time effect for any variable.</p
This study examined the effects of electromyographic (EMG) signals from Biceps Brachii (BB) muscle o...
<p>Correlation between the individual data for movement time and the m-N400 latency for the Grasping...
Comparison between predicted muscle activations and average “on-off” timing of EMG signals reported ...
a<p>male recipients only.</p><p>Shown is the Spearman correlation coefficient. Dependent variable: p...
<p>(A) Gamma power (70–90 Hz) during 50 consecutive trials. EMG onsets are aligned at t = 0. Each tr...
<p>Symbols represent the mean for each subject across 5 experimental sessions. A: There was no relat...
<p>ATE, absolute temporal error; U, unchanged condition; DV, decreased velocity; Latency, latency ti...
<p>Mean EMG<sub>rms</sub> (EMG<sub>mean</sub>), peak EMG<sub>rms</sub> (EMG<sub>peak</sub>) and rate...
<p>Mean level of baseline activity (A) and its variability (B) recorded over 100 ms prior the moveme...
<p>Correlations were calculated for the whole duration of the trial (including both vibration and po...
<p>Distribution of EMG latency (A–C) and principal components waveforms (D–E) over the interval of t...
<p>The simple linear regression of the rate of torque development (RTD) predicted by the rate of rat...
The correlation between the acceleration signals and the ECG signal at different lags.</p
<p>In the figure the mean correlation value and its standard deviation are shown for each considered...
<p>Data are mean ± SD for 12 subjects. Note that there was no time effect for any variable.</p
This study examined the effects of electromyographic (EMG) signals from Biceps Brachii (BB) muscle o...
<p>Correlation between the individual data for movement time and the m-N400 latency for the Grasping...
Comparison between predicted muscle activations and average “on-off” timing of EMG signals reported ...
a<p>male recipients only.</p><p>Shown is the Spearman correlation coefficient. Dependent variable: p...
<p>(A) Gamma power (70–90 Hz) during 50 consecutive trials. EMG onsets are aligned at t = 0. Each tr...
<p>Symbols represent the mean for each subject across 5 experimental sessions. A: There was no relat...