<p>*One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey post-test.</p>#<p>Statistically significant difference between late-phase survivors and early-phase survivors (p<0.05) and between late-phase survivors and early-phase non-survivors (p<0.05), but no difference between early-phase survivors and early-phase non-survivors.</p><p>PF ratio- PaO<sub>2</sub> to FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio.</p><p>Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Subjects by Study Group.</p
Clinical characteristics of registered transplant admissions and univariate analysis comparison betw...
<p>Values expressed as mean (± SD)</p><p>* p values were calculated using ANOVA</p><p>** p<0.001 com...
<p>T1: early pregnancy (before 25 weeks).</p><p>late: late pregnancy (around 36 weeks).</p><p>T2: po...
<p>All values are mean ± SD. With the exception of age, all measures are significantly different by ...
<p>Data are shown as mean±SD; between the two groups, there were no statistical differences of the a...
<p>Data are shown as mean±SD; between the two groups, there were no statistical differences of the a...
Demographic characteristics of the studied population and univariate analysis comparison between ear...
<p>Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants in this study (n = 91) as compared to cl...
<p>No significant differences were found between stage 1 and stage 2.</p>1<p>These data have been pr...
<p>Groups were compared using ANOVA for continuous variables (Age, Co-morbidity) and the Chi-Squared...
<p>Values are mean ± standard deviation. Abbreviations: MCIna, non-amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairmen...
<p>Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD);</p>a<p>the p-values were calculated using...
1.<p>Anova (Tukey's multiple comparisons test).</p>2.<p>Fisher' s exact test.</p><p>Demographic and ...
<p>All p-values (weighted one-way ANOVA contrasts) <0.0001.</p><p>Baseline socio demographic and cli...
<p>+: EPDS>8, −: EPDS<9.</p><p>T1: early pregnancy (before 25 weeks).</p><p>late: late pregnancy (ar...
Clinical characteristics of registered transplant admissions and univariate analysis comparison betw...
<p>Values expressed as mean (± SD)</p><p>* p values were calculated using ANOVA</p><p>** p<0.001 com...
<p>T1: early pregnancy (before 25 weeks).</p><p>late: late pregnancy (around 36 weeks).</p><p>T2: po...
<p>All values are mean ± SD. With the exception of age, all measures are significantly different by ...
<p>Data are shown as mean±SD; between the two groups, there were no statistical differences of the a...
<p>Data are shown as mean±SD; between the two groups, there were no statistical differences of the a...
Demographic characteristics of the studied population and univariate analysis comparison between ear...
<p>Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants in this study (n = 91) as compared to cl...
<p>No significant differences were found between stage 1 and stage 2.</p>1<p>These data have been pr...
<p>Groups were compared using ANOVA for continuous variables (Age, Co-morbidity) and the Chi-Squared...
<p>Values are mean ± standard deviation. Abbreviations: MCIna, non-amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairmen...
<p>Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD);</p>a<p>the p-values were calculated using...
1.<p>Anova (Tukey's multiple comparisons test).</p>2.<p>Fisher' s exact test.</p><p>Demographic and ...
<p>All p-values (weighted one-way ANOVA contrasts) <0.0001.</p><p>Baseline socio demographic and cli...
<p>+: EPDS>8, −: EPDS<9.</p><p>T1: early pregnancy (before 25 weeks).</p><p>late: late pregnancy (ar...
Clinical characteristics of registered transplant admissions and univariate analysis comparison betw...
<p>Values expressed as mean (± SD)</p><p>* p values were calculated using ANOVA</p><p>** p<0.001 com...
<p>T1: early pregnancy (before 25 weeks).</p><p>late: late pregnancy (around 36 weeks).</p><p>T2: po...