<p>Panel (a) - Corrugator EMG activity expressed by Adult-Group and Teenager-Group, to Adult-stimuli and Teenager-stimuli. Panel (b) - RSA-response of Adult-Group and Teenager-Group, to Adult-stimuli and Teenager-stimuli. Error bars represent SE. * = p<0.05, ** = p<0.005.</p
<p>The mean heart rate difference scores of direct gaze (left) and averted gaze (right) in the compu...
<p>Tendency rate for street-children (STch) and controls (Con). * = p < 0.005. Only between groups d...
<p>Mean computed for all the subjects. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM). Horizon...
<p>Adult-Group and Teenager-Group Corrugator EMG activity in response to Adult-stimuli and Teenager-...
<p><b>A)</b> Corrugator EMG activity displayed emotion by emotion for maltreated group (Mal) and con...
<p><b>A)</b> Mean congruent corrugator EMG activity for maltreated group (Mal) and control group (Co...
<p>A) Fear Emotion-false-alarms for street-children (STch) and controls (Con). * = p<0.007. B) Sadne...
<p>In both cases, UTIL participants had significantly lower empathic concern scores than participant...
<p>Only the group difference for the flanker conflict (executive control) effect reached significanc...
Female responses over (A) the first min and (B) the entire five min playback. Error bars show mean ±...
<p>Mean proportion of correct responses to images showing each emotion by each participant age group...
<p>Activation differences between adolescent AN and control participants for emotional stimuli.</p
<p>Activation differences between adolescent and adult control participants for emotional stimuli.</...
<p>Each subject was tested under cold conditions 3 times and under hot conditions 3 times. (a) Avera...
<p>The mean values of each combination of group, condition, and ROI are plotted. Younger adults are ...
<p>The mean heart rate difference scores of direct gaze (left) and averted gaze (right) in the compu...
<p>Tendency rate for street-children (STch) and controls (Con). * = p < 0.005. Only between groups d...
<p>Mean computed for all the subjects. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM). Horizon...
<p>Adult-Group and Teenager-Group Corrugator EMG activity in response to Adult-stimuli and Teenager-...
<p><b>A)</b> Corrugator EMG activity displayed emotion by emotion for maltreated group (Mal) and con...
<p><b>A)</b> Mean congruent corrugator EMG activity for maltreated group (Mal) and control group (Co...
<p>A) Fear Emotion-false-alarms for street-children (STch) and controls (Con). * = p<0.007. B) Sadne...
<p>In both cases, UTIL participants had significantly lower empathic concern scores than participant...
<p>Only the group difference for the flanker conflict (executive control) effect reached significanc...
Female responses over (A) the first min and (B) the entire five min playback. Error bars show mean ±...
<p>Mean proportion of correct responses to images showing each emotion by each participant age group...
<p>Activation differences between adolescent AN and control participants for emotional stimuli.</p
<p>Activation differences between adolescent and adult control participants for emotional stimuli.</...
<p>Each subject was tested under cold conditions 3 times and under hot conditions 3 times. (a) Avera...
<p>The mean values of each combination of group, condition, and ROI are plotted. Younger adults are ...
<p>The mean heart rate difference scores of direct gaze (left) and averted gaze (right) in the compu...
<p>Tendency rate for street-children (STch) and controls (Con). * = p < 0.005. Only between groups d...
<p>Mean computed for all the subjects. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM). Horizon...