<p>Comparison between model and empirical performance in grip force tracking.</p
Comparing performance of the proposed methods built with different number of individual models.</p
<p>Comparison between experimental and the improved model under different strain rates.</p
<p>(A) RATE in the spontaneous and maximal velocity conditions, (B) Touch Duration in the 2 Hz condi...
Comparison of model vs. human performance on the human test set (200 reports).</p
<p>(A) Performance score and (B) excess correlations for different models with independently vari...
<p>The data are averaged over the whole population. Each box shows the mean value (central line) and...
<p>Comparison of the performance of our models with that of LACE, assuming a 25% intervention rate.<...
<p>The force-based model with Curl noise function is more accurate with respect to the real trajecto...
<p>The performance comparison of the models trained with different sequence lengths.</p
Comparison of the experimental data from the literature with the simulation results of this study.</...
<p>Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...
Comparison of the performance of the KISM model on datasets with the state-of-the-art methods.</p
<p>Under the feedback control, the tracking performance of the original model and the reduced model ...
<p>Comparison of pairwise linear models for response times and response levels data.</p
Comparison of the average correct answer positions among different model setups.</p
Comparing performance of the proposed methods built with different number of individual models.</p
<p>Comparison between experimental and the improved model under different strain rates.</p
<p>(A) RATE in the spontaneous and maximal velocity conditions, (B) Touch Duration in the 2 Hz condi...
Comparison of model vs. human performance on the human test set (200 reports).</p
<p>(A) Performance score and (B) excess correlations for different models with independently vari...
<p>The data are averaged over the whole population. Each box shows the mean value (central line) and...
<p>Comparison of the performance of our models with that of LACE, assuming a 25% intervention rate.<...
<p>The force-based model with Curl noise function is more accurate with respect to the real trajecto...
<p>The performance comparison of the models trained with different sequence lengths.</p
Comparison of the experimental data from the literature with the simulation results of this study.</...
<p>Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...
Comparison of the performance of the KISM model on datasets with the state-of-the-art methods.</p
<p>Under the feedback control, the tracking performance of the original model and the reduced model ...
<p>Comparison of pairwise linear models for response times and response levels data.</p
Comparison of the average correct answer positions among different model setups.</p
Comparing performance of the proposed methods built with different number of individual models.</p
<p>Comparison between experimental and the improved model under different strain rates.</p
<p>(A) RATE in the spontaneous and maximal velocity conditions, (B) Touch Duration in the 2 Hz condi...
DOI
Add to ORKG