<p>The general profile change is from blunt to pointed, but this excludes some of the subtle profile shape changes.</p
<p>A. Cephalic plate; B. Forcipular coxosternite; C. Tergite 21. The CV plots represent the discrimi...
<p>(<b>A</b>) Contact angle measurements of structurally modified and flat PDMS, PS, PC, and PE. (<b...
This paper investigates the effect of process parameters on the shape of three-dimensional (3D) curv...
<p>The right hand column is an overlay plot for each model series, showing the progressive deformati...
<p>Importantly, the “stratigraphic layer” variable has been specifically transformed for usage in th...
<p>The outlines on each axis represent extreme shapes along each component (see Method for an explan...
FIG. S2. Extreme shapes from PC axes overlain to demonstrate geometry change in lateral (left), dors...
<p>Anterior (a), superior (b), and lateral (c) views. The dots (“candy”) represent the shape at the ...
<p>CV1, CV2 and CV3 arranged vertically, respectively. In the wireframes, dotted lines represent sha...
Line profiles are taken in yellow line of the corresponding reference image. (a) Line profiles of th...
<p>A and B) Raw data and fitting curve showing the raw stimulus profiles in the absence (black) and ...
<p>Articular surface flattening in coronal (A), sagittal (B), and axial (C) images.</p
Line profiles are taken in yellow line of the corresponding reference image. (a) Line profiles of th...
<p>This table shows the percent of variation explained by the first 8 PC axes of mandible and upper ...
<p>Shown on the margins of the graph is the change in tooth shape along each corresponding axis. Ref...
<p>A. Cephalic plate; B. Forcipular coxosternite; C. Tergite 21. The CV plots represent the discrimi...
<p>(<b>A</b>) Contact angle measurements of structurally modified and flat PDMS, PS, PC, and PE. (<b...
This paper investigates the effect of process parameters on the shape of three-dimensional (3D) curv...
<p>The right hand column is an overlay plot for each model series, showing the progressive deformati...
<p>Importantly, the “stratigraphic layer” variable has been specifically transformed for usage in th...
<p>The outlines on each axis represent extreme shapes along each component (see Method for an explan...
FIG. S2. Extreme shapes from PC axes overlain to demonstrate geometry change in lateral (left), dors...
<p>Anterior (a), superior (b), and lateral (c) views. The dots (“candy”) represent the shape at the ...
<p>CV1, CV2 and CV3 arranged vertically, respectively. In the wireframes, dotted lines represent sha...
Line profiles are taken in yellow line of the corresponding reference image. (a) Line profiles of th...
<p>A and B) Raw data and fitting curve showing the raw stimulus profiles in the absence (black) and ...
<p>Articular surface flattening in coronal (A), sagittal (B), and axial (C) images.</p
Line profiles are taken in yellow line of the corresponding reference image. (a) Line profiles of th...
<p>This table shows the percent of variation explained by the first 8 PC axes of mandible and upper ...
<p>Shown on the margins of the graph is the change in tooth shape along each corresponding axis. Ref...
<p>A. Cephalic plate; B. Forcipular coxosternite; C. Tergite 21. The CV plots represent the discrimi...
<p>(<b>A</b>) Contact angle measurements of structurally modified and flat PDMS, PS, PC, and PE. (<b...
This paper investigates the effect of process parameters on the shape of three-dimensional (3D) curv...
DOI
Add to ORKG