Comparison of reconstruction methods on half-dose images: (a) Reconstructed images, with (L) FBP, (M) IRIS, and (R) TV with advanced system modeling, (b) Zoomed images from different slices; each sub-figure shows (L) FBP, (M) IRIS, and (R) TV with advanced system modeling. Display in HU.

Application of sigmoidal optimization to reconstruct nuclear medicine image: Comparison with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction method

김동욱

January 2021

High levels for noise and a loss of true signal make the quantitative interpretation of nuclear medi...

Qualitative and quantitative comparison of different photodestruction methods.

Christopher C. Valley (720386)
Sheng Liu (96490)
Diane S. Lidke (212549)
Keith A. Lidke (414836)

April 2015

(A) Photodestruction with NaBH4 quenching alone results in noticeable cross-talk from ...

Comparison of signal, noise, SNR and CNR between the reconstructions FBP/QDS, AIDR 3D mild, AIDR 3D standard and AIDR 3D strong.

Sarah Feger (735485)
Matthias Rief (183856)
Elke Zimmermann (76427)
Peter Martus (158797)
Joanne Désirée Schuijf (735486)
Jörg Blobel (735487)
Felicitas Richter (735488)
Marc Dewey (43174)

May 2015

Values are given in arithmetic mean (SD); reconstruction with filtered back projection/ quantum d...

SNR comparison of the three reconstruction methods for the half-dose dataset in Figure 10.

Synho Do (659417)
William Clem Karl (659418)
Sarabjeet Singh (659419)
Mannudeep Kalra (659420)
Tom Brady (659421)
Ellie Shin (659422)
Homer Pien (659423)

November 2014

SNR comparison of the three reconstruction methods for the half-dose dataset in Figure 10.</p

CNR comparison of the three reconstruction methods for the half-dose dataset in Figure 10.

Synho Do (659417)
William Clem Karl (659418)
Sarabjeet Singh (659419)
Mannudeep Kalra (659420)
Tom Brady (659421)
Ellie Shin (659422)
Homer Pien (659423)

November 2014

CNR comparison of the three reconstruction methods for the half-dose dataset in Figure 10.</p

Comparison of static imaging and reference high-dose protocols.

Juan F. P. J. Abascal (650572)
Monica Abella (716533)
Alejandro Sisniega (716534)
Juan Jose Vaquero (5662924)
Manuel Desco (308819)

April 2015

FDK reconstructions of gated data obtained with the reference high-dose protocol (A) and with the...

The reconstructed results of different methods on Brain image from noisy and undersampled Fourier data (noise level: 30 dB and sampling ratio: 20%).

Pengfei Liu (136115)
Liang Xiao (215043)
Jun Zhang (48506)

September 2015

(A) Original image; (B) TV-FISTA result; (C) HDTV2-MM result; (D) HDTV2-FBS result; (E) the zoome...

Comparison of the reconstruction algorithms with varying kVs on the 50-th slice.

Haewon Nam (4102705)
Minghao Guo (667684)
Hengyong Yu (154822)
Keumsil Lee (6199481)
Ruijiang Li (830188)
Bin Han (45760)
Lei Xing (129950)
Rena Lee (6199484)
Hao Gao (154820)

January 2019

ROI4 is the set of the interiors of the small red circles. ROIAIR is defined as the air part inside ...

Comparisons on PBDW-based reconstructed images for three models.

Yunsong Liu (284270)
Jian-Feng Cai (498405)
Zhifang Zhan (718479)
Di Guo (718480)
Jing Ye (94291)
Zhong Chen (32985)
Xiaobo Qu (718481)

April 2015

(a) the fully sampled image; (b)-(d) are reconstructed images using analysis, balanced and synthe...

Comparison of undersampled reconstructions in a 72 rays/frame dataset (subject 8).

Ye Tian (220278)
Jason Mendes (6321074)
Apoorva Pedgaonkar (6321077)
Mark Ibrahim (6321080)
Leif Jensen (6321083)
Joyce D. Schroeder (6321086)
Brent Wilson (468739)
Edward V. R. DiBella (6321089)
Ganesh Adluru (6321092)

February 2019

Simulated undersampling was done by keeping only the first 30 rays. The 72 rays reconstruction is sl...

Comparison of the tomographic image reconstructions of the breast obtained with the FBP (b and g), the TV minimization (c and h), the EST (d and i), and our method (e and j) using 200 projections over the 1000 available.

Alessandro Mirone (677930)
Emmanuel Brun (677931)
Paola Coan (677932)

December 2014

The right images (f and k) are the images computed with the FBP using the entire set of projectio...

Comparison of general data and objective image quality of patients between Group 1 (routine-dose FBP reconstruction) and Group 2 (120 KV+84 mAs/IRT L5 reconstruction).

Yang Hou (378690)
Jiahe Zheng (378691)
Yuke Wang (378692)
Mei Yu (48172)
Mani Vembar (378693)
Qiyong Guo (290901)

February 2013

Note: †indicates the results of x2. SNR: Signal-to-noise ratio, CNR:...

Comparison of Different Reconstruction Algorithms for Decreasing the Exposure Dose during Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Phantom Study

Tsutomu Gomi

January 2015

We compared reconstruction algorithms [filtered back projection (FBP), maximum likelihood ex-pectati...

The compare of reconstruction performance between SIRT, SART, MAP-EM and Iterative FBP (the image size is 512 × 512 and the angle interval is 0.5°).

Hongli Shi (717543)
Shuqian Luo (229055)
Zhi Yang (124104)
Geming Wu (801195)

September 2015

The compare of reconstruction performance between SIRT, SART, MAP-EM and Iterative FBP (the image...

Comparison of qualitative tumour segment reconstruction ratios: (i) NCD/REC (NcReR), (ii) overlapped voxels (OvReR), (iii) DIF/REC (DiReR) and (v) NOI/REC (NOI/ESI) (NoEsR/NoReR) for five cases assuming FCM classification of enhanced scaled (ES) images observed at six consecutive time frames and the proposed hybrid tumour classification using one channel.

X. -X. Yin (3829708)
S. Hadjiloucas (3829717)
J. -H. Chen (3829705)
Y. Zhang (67313)
J. -L. Wu (3829711)
M. -Y. Su (3829714)

March 2017

Comparison of qualitative tumour segment reconstruction ratios: (i) NCD/REC (NcReR), (ii) overlap...

Application of sigmoidal optimization to reconstruct nuclear medicine image: Comparison with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction method

김동욱

January 2021

High levels for noise and a loss of true signal make the quantitative interpretation of nuclear medi...

Qualitative and quantitative comparison of different photodestruction methods.

Christopher C. Valley (720386)
Sheng Liu (96490)
Diane S. Lidke (212549)
Keith A. Lidke (414836)

April 2015

(A) Photodestruction with NaBH4 quenching alone results in noticeable cross-talk from ...

Comparison of signal, noise, SNR and CNR between the reconstructions FBP/QDS, AIDR 3D mild, AIDR 3D standard and AIDR 3D strong.

Sarah Feger (735485)
Matthias Rief (183856)
Elke Zimmermann (76427)
Peter Martus (158797)
Joanne Désirée Schuijf (735486)
Jörg Blobel (735487)
Felicitas Richter (735488)
Marc Dewey (43174)

May 2015

Values are given in arithmetic mean (SD); reconstruction with filtered back projection/ quantum d...

SNR comparison of the three reconstruction methods for the half-dose dataset in Figure 10.

Synho Do (659417)
William Clem Karl (659418)
Sarabjeet Singh (659419)
Mannudeep Kalra (659420)
Tom Brady (659421)
Ellie Shin (659422)
Homer Pien (659423)

November 2014

SNR comparison of the three reconstruction methods for the half-dose dataset in Figure 10.</p

CNR comparison of the three reconstruction methods for the half-dose dataset in Figure 10.

Synho Do (659417)
William Clem Karl (659418)
Sarabjeet Singh (659419)
Mannudeep Kalra (659420)
Tom Brady (659421)
Ellie Shin (659422)
Homer Pien (659423)

November 2014

CNR comparison of the three reconstruction methods for the half-dose dataset in Figure 10.</p

Comparison of static imaging and reference high-dose protocols.

Juan F. P. J. Abascal (650572)
Monica Abella (716533)
Alejandro Sisniega (716534)
Juan Jose Vaquero (5662924)
Manuel Desco (308819)

April 2015

FDK reconstructions of gated data obtained with the reference high-dose protocol (A) and with the...

The reconstructed results of different methods on Brain image from noisy and undersampled Fourier data (noise level: 30 dB and sampling ratio: 20%).

Pengfei Liu (136115)
Liang Xiao (215043)
Jun Zhang (48506)

September 2015

(A) Original image; (B) TV-FISTA result; (C) HDTV2-MM result; (D) HDTV2-FBS result; (E) the zoome...

Comparison of the reconstruction algorithms with varying kVs on the 50-th slice.

Haewon Nam (4102705)
Minghao Guo (667684)
Hengyong Yu (154822)
Keumsil Lee (6199481)
Ruijiang Li (830188)
Bin Han (45760)
Lei Xing (129950)
Rena Lee (6199484)
Hao Gao (154820)

January 2019

ROI4 is the set of the interiors of the small red circles. ROIAIR is defined as the air part inside ...

Comparisons on PBDW-based reconstructed images for three models.

Yunsong Liu (284270)
Jian-Feng Cai (498405)
Zhifang Zhan (718479)
Di Guo (718480)
Jing Ye (94291)
Zhong Chen (32985)
Xiaobo Qu (718481)

April 2015

(a) the fully sampled image; (b)-(d) are reconstructed images using analysis, balanced and synthe...

Comparison of undersampled reconstructions in a 72 rays/frame dataset (subject 8).

Ye Tian (220278)
Jason Mendes (6321074)
Apoorva Pedgaonkar (6321077)
Mark Ibrahim (6321080)
Leif Jensen (6321083)
Joyce D. Schroeder (6321086)
Brent Wilson (468739)
Edward V. R. DiBella (6321089)
Ganesh Adluru (6321092)

February 2019

Simulated undersampling was done by keeping only the first 30 rays. The 72 rays reconstruction is sl...

Comparison of the tomographic image reconstructions of the breast obtained with the FBP (b and g), the TV minimization (c and h), the EST (d and i), and our method (e and j) using 200 projections over the 1000 available.

Alessandro Mirone (677930)
Emmanuel Brun (677931)
Paola Coan (677932)

December 2014

The right images (f and k) are the images computed with the FBP using the entire set of projectio...

Comparison of general data and objective image quality of patients between Group 1 (routine-dose FBP reconstruction) and Group 2 (120 KV+84 mAs/IRT L5 reconstruction).

Yang Hou (378690)
Jiahe Zheng (378691)
Yuke Wang (378692)
Mei Yu (48172)
Mani Vembar (378693)
Qiyong Guo (290901)

February 2013

Note: †indicates the results of x2. SNR: Signal-to-noise ratio, CNR:...

Comparison of Different Reconstruction Algorithms for Decreasing the Exposure Dose during Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Phantom Study

Tsutomu Gomi

January 2015

We compared reconstruction algorithms [filtered back projection (FBP), maximum likelihood ex-pectati...

The compare of reconstruction performance between SIRT, SART, MAP-EM and Iterative FBP (the image size is 512 × 512 and the angle interval is 0.5°).

Hongli Shi (717543)
Shuqian Luo (229055)
Zhi Yang (124104)
Geming Wu (801195)

September 2015

The compare of reconstruction performance between SIRT, SART, MAP-EM and Iterative FBP (the image...

Comparison of qualitative tumour segment reconstruction ratios: (i) NCD/REC (NcReR), (ii) overlapped voxels (OvReR), (iii) DIF/REC (DiReR) and (v) NOI/REC (NOI/ESI) (NoEsR/NoReR) for five cases assuming FCM classification of enhanced scaled (ES) images observed at six consecutive time frames and the proposed hybrid tumour classification using one channel.

X. -X. Yin (3829708)
S. Hadjiloucas (3829717)
J. -H. Chen (3829705)
Y. Zhang (67313)
J. -L. Wu (3829711)
M. -Y. Su (3829714)

March 2017

Comparison of qualitative tumour segment reconstruction ratios: (i) NCD/REC (NcReR), (ii) overlap...

Application of sigmoidal optimization to reconstruct nuclear medicine image: Comparison with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction method

김동욱

January 2021

High levels for noise and a loss of true signal make the quantitative interpretation of nuclear medi...

Qualitative and quantitative comparison of different photodestruction methods.

Christopher C. Valley (720386)
Sheng Liu (96490)
Diane S. Lidke (212549)
Keith A. Lidke (414836)

April 2015

(A) Photodestruction with NaBH4 quenching alone results in noticeable cross-talk from ...

Comparison of signal, noise, SNR and CNR between the reconstructions FBP/QDS, AIDR 3D mild, AIDR 3D standard and AIDR 3D strong.

Sarah Feger (735485)
Matthias Rief (183856)
Elke Zimmermann (76427)
Peter Martus (158797)
Joanne Désirée Schuijf (735486)
Jörg Blobel (735487)
Felicitas Richter (735488)
Marc Dewey (43174)

May 2015

Values are given in arithmetic mean (SD); reconstruction with filtered back projection/ quantum d...

Comparison of reconstruction methods on half-dose images: (a) Reconstructed images, with (L) FBP, (M) IRIS, and (R) TV with advanced system modeling, (b) Zoomed images from different slices; each sub-figure shows (L) FBP, (M) IRIS, and (R) TV with advanced system modeling. Display in HU.

Abstract

Extracted data

Comparison of reconstruction methods on half-dose images: (a) Reconstructed images, with (L) FBP, (M) IRIS, and (R) TV with advanced system modeling, (b) Zoomed images from different slices; each sub-figure shows (L) FBP, (M) IRIS, and (R) TV with advanced system modeling. Display in HU.

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items