<p>Histogram showing that the mean histological grading scores are decreased in the BMMSC group compared to the Allogeneic control group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (*p≤0.05).</p
<p>Histogram of classifications by KW score (calculated as ratio of votes for Abnormal to total numb...
<p>Histograms of mock EDSS data in a control group (sample 0) and 5 treatment groups (samples 1–5).<...
<p>The figure shows the histogram as is explained in the text. The Y-axis shows the mean relative ch...
<p>The data represent means and standard deviations.</p>a<p><i>P</i><0.05 in comparison to negative ...
Top left panel: Banff Grade 3 AR (clinical picture) Top right panel: Histopathology of Grade 3 AR sh...
<p>All data are expressed as mean ± SD. *<i>P</i><0.05, vs. sham group. #<i>P</i><0.05, vs. PN group...
<p>ABS levels are shown for two individuals with (C and D) and two individuals without (A and B) mod...
<p>In total 75 parameters were found to be significantly changed between histopathologically negativ...
<p>A) Tumour regression grade 2 (Mandard). Few, scattered residual cancer areas (arrows) separated b...
<p>Histogram depicting the distribution of the judgments in the zero contingency condition, for the ...
<p>Average histograms of GM image (left), WM image (middle), and CSF image (right) for non-responder...
<p>The occurence of early/late rejection episodes was higher in BDD group (<i>P</i><0.05).</p
<p>ABS level is shown for three individuals: (A) a heart transplant recipient without moderate-to-se...
<p>The histogram compares the semiquantitative score performed on the periosteum, cortex and medulla...
Differences were statistically analyzed using Student’s t-test for variables with a parametric distr...
<p>Histogram of classifications by KW score (calculated as ratio of votes for Abnormal to total numb...
<p>Histograms of mock EDSS data in a control group (sample 0) and 5 treatment groups (samples 1–5).<...
<p>The figure shows the histogram as is explained in the text. The Y-axis shows the mean relative ch...
<p>The data represent means and standard deviations.</p>a<p><i>P</i><0.05 in comparison to negative ...
Top left panel: Banff Grade 3 AR (clinical picture) Top right panel: Histopathology of Grade 3 AR sh...
<p>All data are expressed as mean ± SD. *<i>P</i><0.05, vs. sham group. #<i>P</i><0.05, vs. PN group...
<p>ABS levels are shown for two individuals with (C and D) and two individuals without (A and B) mod...
<p>In total 75 parameters were found to be significantly changed between histopathologically negativ...
<p>A) Tumour regression grade 2 (Mandard). Few, scattered residual cancer areas (arrows) separated b...
<p>Histogram depicting the distribution of the judgments in the zero contingency condition, for the ...
<p>Average histograms of GM image (left), WM image (middle), and CSF image (right) for non-responder...
<p>The occurence of early/late rejection episodes was higher in BDD group (<i>P</i><0.05).</p
<p>ABS level is shown for three individuals: (A) a heart transplant recipient without moderate-to-se...
<p>The histogram compares the semiquantitative score performed on the periosteum, cortex and medulla...
Differences were statistically analyzed using Student’s t-test for variables with a parametric distr...
<p>Histogram of classifications by KW score (calculated as ratio of votes for Abnormal to total numb...
<p>Histograms of mock EDSS data in a control group (sample 0) and 5 treatment groups (samples 1–5).<...
<p>The figure shows the histogram as is explained in the text. The Y-axis shows the mean relative ch...
DOI
Add to ORKG