<p>Data are expressed as mean ±SD. n = 15 in Control SHAM, PM SHAM and PM OVX+17β-estradiol groups and 14 in PM OVX group. ANOVA, Tukey-Kramer.</p><p>*p<0.05: versus Control SHAM,</p>¶¶<p>p<0.01 versus PM OVX+17β-estradiol.</p><p>Uterine weight among the four groups.</p
<p>The values are expressed as the means ± SD. N = 20/group.</p><p><sup>a, b, c</sup> p<0.05 <i>vers...
<p>Table presents the mean (SD). Values for amniotic fluid analyses are ng/ml or pmol/min (MMP activ...
<p>Significant differences were observed between collective sham and injured groups (asterisks). Err...
<p>The body weights of each group are shown on line graphs for each week. Values are expressed as me...
<p>Uterine weights are shown in box graphs. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD, n = 5–7 for each ...
<p>Data are shown as mean ± SEM.</p>*<p>p<0.05 versus Sham and #p<0.05 versus OVX.</p><p>ANOVA one w...
<p><sup>a</sup> Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation;</p><p><sup>b</sup> Student t-test f...
<p>Data in the table are presented as n (%), mean ± SD, and median [range].</p><p>Comparison of Gene...
<p>(1)Participants with gravida > 3,compared with control group,<i>P</i><0.05);(2)Participants with ...
<p><b>(A)</b> Effects of E2 and EA on body weight. <b>(B)</b> The uterus index was represented as ut...
<p>Comparison between the mean (SD) of the studied variables between preeclamptic and control women....
<p>Data in the table are presented as n (%), mean ± SD, and median [range].</p><p>Demographic and Cl...
<p>Data are mean±SD or number (%) and n = 10 per group.</p>a<p> P<0.05 compared with Control and Apo...
<p>All data were expressed as means ± SEM.</p><p>*<i>P</i><0.05,</p><p>**<i>P</i><0.01 as compared w...
<p>Values are expressed as means±SEM; <i>n</i> = 10–12/group. * <i>p</i><0.05 vs. Control (main effe...
<p>The values are expressed as the means ± SD. N = 20/group.</p><p><sup>a, b, c</sup> p<0.05 <i>vers...
<p>Table presents the mean (SD). Values for amniotic fluid analyses are ng/ml or pmol/min (MMP activ...
<p>Significant differences were observed between collective sham and injured groups (asterisks). Err...
<p>The body weights of each group are shown on line graphs for each week. Values are expressed as me...
<p>Uterine weights are shown in box graphs. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD, n = 5–7 for each ...
<p>Data are shown as mean ± SEM.</p>*<p>p<0.05 versus Sham and #p<0.05 versus OVX.</p><p>ANOVA one w...
<p><sup>a</sup> Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation;</p><p><sup>b</sup> Student t-test f...
<p>Data in the table are presented as n (%), mean ± SD, and median [range].</p><p>Comparison of Gene...
<p>(1)Participants with gravida > 3,compared with control group,<i>P</i><0.05);(2)Participants with ...
<p><b>(A)</b> Effects of E2 and EA on body weight. <b>(B)</b> The uterus index was represented as ut...
<p>Comparison between the mean (SD) of the studied variables between preeclamptic and control women....
<p>Data in the table are presented as n (%), mean ± SD, and median [range].</p><p>Demographic and Cl...
<p>Data are mean±SD or number (%) and n = 10 per group.</p>a<p> P<0.05 compared with Control and Apo...
<p>All data were expressed as means ± SEM.</p><p>*<i>P</i><0.05,</p><p>**<i>P</i><0.01 as compared w...
<p>Values are expressed as means±SEM; <i>n</i> = 10–12/group. * <i>p</i><0.05 vs. Control (main effe...
<p>The values are expressed as the means ± SD. N = 20/group.</p><p><sup>a, b, c</sup> p<0.05 <i>vers...
<p>Table presents the mean (SD). Values for amniotic fluid analyses are ng/ml or pmol/min (MMP activ...
<p>Significant differences were observed between collective sham and injured groups (asterisks). Err...