<p>Panels a, b and c are for zero obstacle, one obstacle and two obstacles, respectively. The data of the first run (black dots) is above the other two runs in panel a and c, which means the former participants escape slower than the latter ones. In panel b, however, the data of the first run lies between those of the second run and the third run, indicating that the escape speed of the first run is faster than that of the second run and slower than that of the third run. Therefore, the escape time has no correlation with experiments order.</p
<p>Average escape time (in sec) against trial number <i>N</i> obtained from: (a) Individual training...
<p>We use the same simulations as described in <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi...
<p>The two different orders of estimates in Experiment 1, the percentage of participants' violations...
<p>The average escape speed for zero, one and two obstacles with the optimized positions is shown fo...
<p>A,B: distance of participants from the centre of exit D2 over time. A and B show the data for dif...
<p>The average escape time is the average time of three runs in each of the three obstacle configura...
<p>As a baseline, when there is no obstacle in the room, the average escape speed of the crowd deter...
<p>In both panels the time of emergence of mutants with a given number of escape mutations is shown....
<p>Comparison of patients and controls initial transition times into the seizure state. A seizure st...
<p>As these nodes have different escape time patterns in patients and controls we checked for networ...
<p>(A) Escape variants often only transiently replace the wild-type variant and oscillate thereafter...
<p>Individual rates of the amount of trials reached as valid regarding the fixation compliance (A); ...
<p>Panels A and B (feature foraging) and C and D (conjunction foraging) show the relationship betwee...
<p>(<b>A-D</b>) Panels A-D correspond to Experiments 1 to 4, respectively, and the error bars indica...
<p>In the absence of a genetic barrier, population genetics theory <a href="http://www.plosone.org/a...
<p>Average escape time (in sec) against trial number <i>N</i> obtained from: (a) Individual training...
<p>We use the same simulations as described in <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi...
<p>The two different orders of estimates in Experiment 1, the percentage of participants' violations...
<p>The average escape speed for zero, one and two obstacles with the optimized positions is shown fo...
<p>A,B: distance of participants from the centre of exit D2 over time. A and B show the data for dif...
<p>The average escape time is the average time of three runs in each of the three obstacle configura...
<p>As a baseline, when there is no obstacle in the room, the average escape speed of the crowd deter...
<p>In both panels the time of emergence of mutants with a given number of escape mutations is shown....
<p>Comparison of patients and controls initial transition times into the seizure state. A seizure st...
<p>As these nodes have different escape time patterns in patients and controls we checked for networ...
<p>(A) Escape variants often only transiently replace the wild-type variant and oscillate thereafter...
<p>Individual rates of the amount of trials reached as valid regarding the fixation compliance (A); ...
<p>Panels A and B (feature foraging) and C and D (conjunction foraging) show the relationship betwee...
<p>(<b>A-D</b>) Panels A-D correspond to Experiments 1 to 4, respectively, and the error bars indica...
<p>In the absence of a genetic barrier, population genetics theory <a href="http://www.plosone.org/a...
<p>Average escape time (in sec) against trial number <i>N</i> obtained from: (a) Individual training...
<p>We use the same simulations as described in <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi...
<p>The two different orders of estimates in Experiment 1, the percentage of participants' violations...