<p>(A) Shows the weights given to each of the three dimensions (height, depth, and lateral) when computing the first PC of the movement kinematics. Each point represents the PC weight calculated using a different cross-validation. (B–D) Show different views of the experimental paradigm and example kinematics from one of the subjects' sessions. The red dashed line represents the first PC plotted in Cartesian space for that same session.</p
<p>(A) Setup used to compare two kinematic mounts; KM kinematic mount under test. (B) Setup used to ...
<p>Exemplar data from grasping and pointing from a single subject, for a single bar position. (A) Ve...
The upper (lower) left triangle of each sub-table compares the upper (lower) quartiles of each param...
<p>(A) Kinematogram with different levels of coherence with dots moving in the same direction presen...
<p>Typical single subject examples of kinematic data for all four movement tasks during scanning (se...
<p>Data plotted in dark grey represent subjects who grasped the same handle in all three sessions. D...
<p>Panel A presents vertical object velocity vs. time during object lift. Panel B shows object roll ...
Comparison of body position between the human subject and simulation during the maximal platform dis...
<p>(A) The experimental apparatus illustrated. The participant’s forearm is placed on a forearm supp...
(a) Example timeseries of postural sway tracked in three dimensions. (b) Timeseries of head displace...
(A) Subjects walked on a treadmill mounted on top of a 6 degree-of-freedom motion base. (B) Examples...
<p>A representative example of the first, second, and third principal components of the kinematics f...
The selected subject has achieved the highest mean of the QS across all experiments combined. The to...
The selected subject has achieved the highest mean of the QS across all experiments combined. The to...
<p>The top row depicts the stimulus used in Experiment 1 (contrast), the middle row the stimulus in ...
<p>(A) Setup used to compare two kinematic mounts; KM kinematic mount under test. (B) Setup used to ...
<p>Exemplar data from grasping and pointing from a single subject, for a single bar position. (A) Ve...
The upper (lower) left triangle of each sub-table compares the upper (lower) quartiles of each param...
<p>(A) Kinematogram with different levels of coherence with dots moving in the same direction presen...
<p>Typical single subject examples of kinematic data for all four movement tasks during scanning (se...
<p>Data plotted in dark grey represent subjects who grasped the same handle in all three sessions. D...
<p>Panel A presents vertical object velocity vs. time during object lift. Panel B shows object roll ...
Comparison of body position between the human subject and simulation during the maximal platform dis...
<p>(A) The experimental apparatus illustrated. The participant’s forearm is placed on a forearm supp...
(a) Example timeseries of postural sway tracked in three dimensions. (b) Timeseries of head displace...
(A) Subjects walked on a treadmill mounted on top of a 6 degree-of-freedom motion base. (B) Examples...
<p>A representative example of the first, second, and third principal components of the kinematics f...
The selected subject has achieved the highest mean of the QS across all experiments combined. The to...
The selected subject has achieved the highest mean of the QS across all experiments combined. The to...
<p>The top row depicts the stimulus used in Experiment 1 (contrast), the middle row the stimulus in ...
<p>(A) Setup used to compare two kinematic mounts; KM kinematic mount under test. (B) Setup used to ...
<p>Exemplar data from grasping and pointing from a single subject, for a single bar position. (A) Ve...
The upper (lower) left triangle of each sub-table compares the upper (lower) quartiles of each param...