<p>A. Average position of the species in the two first principal components (PC1 and PC2). Contribution of each axis to total variance is shown in %. Scales of the axes are given in the boxes. Species associations were defined from hierarchical cluster analysis by Ward’s method of the species coordinates. See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0117220#pone.0117220.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a> for species labels. B. Temporal variations in PC1 and PC2. Note that temporal trend in PC1 was highly significant (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.68, p < 0.005), and the absence of sampling in the years 2001–2002 and 2008.</p
<p>Only the seven species that contributed the most to this temporal trend are pictured. These speci...
International audienceThe inter-annual variability of the fish and macrocrustacean spring community ...
Assemblages associated with intertidal rocky shores were examined for large scale distribution patte...
<p>Each bar represent the density at a sampling date. “X” indicate years with no sampling (2001–2002...
<p>Contribution of each axis to total variance explained is shown in %. Scales of the axes are given...
<p>Pure time indicates the fraction of variation explained by time after factoring out the shared va...
Employing ecological approaches to fisheries management or comprehensive marine spatial planning req...
<p>Selected fish groups are a) snappers (n = 226), b) groupers (n = 260), c) highly valued commercia...
<p>Fish pictures and family numbers are placed on the centroid of each family and used to identify t...
<p>Fish pictures and family numbers are placed on the centroid of each family and used to identify t...
<p><b>Fish assemblage structure compared among habitats and regions-times, in terms of (A) presence ...
<p>Coefficients of variation associated with different factors and temporal scales of variability in...
<p>The percentage of variation explained by each principal component is shown in parentheses.</p
Abstract Sublittoral macrobenthic communities in the Skomer Marine Nature Reserve (SMNR), Pembrokes...
Evidence for climate-correlated low frequency variability of various components of marine ecosystems...
<p>Only the seven species that contributed the most to this temporal trend are pictured. These speci...
International audienceThe inter-annual variability of the fish and macrocrustacean spring community ...
Assemblages associated with intertidal rocky shores were examined for large scale distribution patte...
<p>Each bar represent the density at a sampling date. “X” indicate years with no sampling (2001–2002...
<p>Contribution of each axis to total variance explained is shown in %. Scales of the axes are given...
<p>Pure time indicates the fraction of variation explained by time after factoring out the shared va...
Employing ecological approaches to fisheries management or comprehensive marine spatial planning req...
<p>Selected fish groups are a) snappers (n = 226), b) groupers (n = 260), c) highly valued commercia...
<p>Fish pictures and family numbers are placed on the centroid of each family and used to identify t...
<p>Fish pictures and family numbers are placed on the centroid of each family and used to identify t...
<p><b>Fish assemblage structure compared among habitats and regions-times, in terms of (A) presence ...
<p>Coefficients of variation associated with different factors and temporal scales of variability in...
<p>The percentage of variation explained by each principal component is shown in parentheses.</p
Abstract Sublittoral macrobenthic communities in the Skomer Marine Nature Reserve (SMNR), Pembrokes...
Evidence for climate-correlated low frequency variability of various components of marine ecosystems...
<p>Only the seven species that contributed the most to this temporal trend are pictured. These speci...
International audienceThe inter-annual variability of the fish and macrocrustacean spring community ...
Assemblages associated with intertidal rocky shores were examined for large scale distribution patte...