Mean (±SEM) log odds of high-uncertainty choices for each group in Experiment 2 as a function of the probability of high-uncertainty food delivery (A) and the expected value of a high-uncertainty outcome (B).

Log-Ratios Comparing Probability of Visiting a Choice Alternative Given Time Spent Away From That Option, Relative To Overall Probability of Choice

Greg Jensen (712648)

July 2018

Log-ratios comparing the probability of making a choice after t trials of not having made tha...

Proportional odds model examining the impact of seeing uncertainty in the initial recommendation on accepting that recommendation.

Hannah Mendoza (14259118)
Lucy D’Agostino McGowan (4993355)

December 2022

Proportional odds model examining the impact of seeing uncertainty in the initial recommendation on ...

Results of Experiment 2.

Penelope Lacombe (14259360)
Sarah Brocard (14259363)
Klaus Zuberbühler (42992)
Christoph D. Dahl (14259366)

December 2022

Mean percentage of trials where subjects selected the risky option according to the value of the ris...

Mean (±SEM) log odds of high-uncertainty choices for each group in Experiment 2 as a function of the outcome of the previous choice, collapsed across the probability of high-uncertainty food delivery.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

A second ordinate showing percentages corresponding to the log odds values was included to aid in...

Mean (±SEM) log odds of high-uncertainty choices for each group in Experiment 1 as a function of the outcome of the previous choice, collapsed across the probability of high-uncertainty food delivery.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

A second ordinate showing percentages corresponding to the log odds values was included to aid in...

Mean (±SEM) log odds of high-uncertainty choices for each group in the high-uncertainty probability training procedure of Experiment 3A as a function of the probability of the 0-pellet outcome (P[0]) or the 1-pellet outcome (P[1]).

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

Note that high-uncertainty choices are plotted against the probability of the manipulated outcome...

Mean (±SEM) log odds of high-uncertainty choices for each group in Experiment 1 as a function of the probability of high-uncertainty food delivery (A) and the expected value of the high-uncertainty outcome (B).

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

The horizontal line indicates neutral preference of the two outcomes. Values below this line refl...

Mean (±SEM) log odds of high-uncertainty choices collapsed across groups in the high-uncertainty probability training procedure of Experiment 3A as a function of the outcome of the previous choice, collapsed across probability.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

A second ordinate showing percentages corresponding to the log odds values was included to aid in...

Mean (±SEM) log odds of high-uncertainty choices in the low-uncertainty magnitude training procedure of Experiment 3B as a function of the outcome magnitude of a low-uncertainty choice.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

A second ordinate showing percentages corresponding to the log odds values is included to aid int...

Expected value of the high-uncertainty choice as a function of the probability of food for a high-uncertainty choice for each group in Experiment 2.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

Expected value of the high-uncertainty choice as a function of the probability of food for a high...

Expected value of the high-uncertainty choice as a function of the probability of food for a high-uncertainty choice for each group in Experiment 1.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

Expected value of the high-uncertainty choice as a function of the probability of food for a high...

Mean (±SEM) difference score between the log odds of high-uncertainty choices following high-uncertainty-large (H-L) outcomes and the log odds of high-uncertainty choices following high-uncertainty-small (H-S) outcomes for each group in Experiment 1 as a function of the difference between the magnitude of the H-S outcome and the expected value of the high-uncertainty choice.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

A negative/positive difference on the abscissa indicates that the H-S outcome magnitude was great...

Mean (±SEM) difference score between the log odds of high-uncertainty choices following high-uncertainty-large (H-L) outcomes and the log odds of high-uncertainty choices following high-uncertainty-small (H-S) outcomes for each group in Experiment 2 as a function of the difference between the magnitude of the H-S outcome and the expected value of the high-uncertainty choice.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

A negative/positive difference on the abscissa indicates that the H-S outcome magnitude was great...

Expected value of the high-uncertainty choice as a function of the probability of receiving 0 pellets (P[0]) or 1 pellet (P[1]) following a high-uncertainty choice in the high-uncertainty probability training procedure of Experiment 3A.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

Expected value of the high-uncertainty choice as a function of the probability of receiving 0 pel...

A: Zero-order correlation between the mean log odds of high-uncertainty choices across probabilities of the P[0] condition (abscissa) and the difference score in the log odds of high-uncertainty choices following high-uncertainty-zero (H-Z) outcomes relative to high-uncertainty-small (H-S) outcomes (ordinate).

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

Here, post H-Z high-uncertainty choice behavior was subtracted from post H-S high-uncertainty cho...

Log-Ratios Comparing Probability of Visiting a Choice Alternative Given Time Spent Away From That Option, Relative To Overall Probability of Choice

Greg Jensen (712648)

July 2018

Log-ratios comparing the probability of making a choice after t trials of not having made tha...

Proportional odds model examining the impact of seeing uncertainty in the initial recommendation on accepting that recommendation.

Hannah Mendoza (14259118)
Lucy D’Agostino McGowan (4993355)

December 2022

Proportional odds model examining the impact of seeing uncertainty in the initial recommendation on ...

Results of Experiment 2.

Penelope Lacombe (14259360)
Sarah Brocard (14259363)
Klaus Zuberbühler (42992)
Christoph D. Dahl (14259366)

December 2022

Mean percentage of trials where subjects selected the risky option according to the value of the ris...

Mean (±SEM) log odds of high-uncertainty choices for each group in Experiment 2 as a function of the outcome of the previous choice, collapsed across the probability of high-uncertainty food delivery.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

A second ordinate showing percentages corresponding to the log odds values was included to aid in...

Mean (±SEM) log odds of high-uncertainty choices for each group in Experiment 1 as a function of the outcome of the previous choice, collapsed across the probability of high-uncertainty food delivery.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

A second ordinate showing percentages corresponding to the log odds values was included to aid in...

Mean (±SEM) log odds of high-uncertainty choices for each group in the high-uncertainty probability training procedure of Experiment 3A as a function of the probability of the 0-pellet outcome (P[0]) or the 1-pellet outcome (P[1]).

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

Note that high-uncertainty choices are plotted against the probability of the manipulated outcome...

Mean (±SEM) log odds of high-uncertainty choices for each group in Experiment 1 as a function of the probability of high-uncertainty food delivery (A) and the expected value of the high-uncertainty outcome (B).

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

The horizontal line indicates neutral preference of the two outcomes. Values below this line refl...

Mean (±SEM) log odds of high-uncertainty choices collapsed across groups in the high-uncertainty probability training procedure of Experiment 3A as a function of the outcome of the previous choice, collapsed across probability.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

A second ordinate showing percentages corresponding to the log odds values was included to aid in...

Mean (±SEM) log odds of high-uncertainty choices in the low-uncertainty magnitude training procedure of Experiment 3B as a function of the outcome magnitude of a low-uncertainty choice.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

A second ordinate showing percentages corresponding to the log odds values is included to aid int...

Expected value of the high-uncertainty choice as a function of the probability of food for a high-uncertainty choice for each group in Experiment 2.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

Expected value of the high-uncertainty choice as a function of the probability of food for a high...

Expected value of the high-uncertainty choice as a function of the probability of food for a high-uncertainty choice for each group in Experiment 1.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

Expected value of the high-uncertainty choice as a function of the probability of food for a high...

Mean (±SEM) difference score between the log odds of high-uncertainty choices following high-uncertainty-large (H-L) outcomes and the log odds of high-uncertainty choices following high-uncertainty-small (H-S) outcomes for each group in Experiment 1 as a function of the difference between the magnitude of the H-S outcome and the expected value of the high-uncertainty choice.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

A negative/positive difference on the abscissa indicates that the H-S outcome magnitude was great...

Mean (±SEM) difference score between the log odds of high-uncertainty choices following high-uncertainty-large (H-L) outcomes and the log odds of high-uncertainty choices following high-uncertainty-small (H-S) outcomes for each group in Experiment 2 as a function of the difference between the magnitude of the H-S outcome and the expected value of the high-uncertainty choice.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

A negative/positive difference on the abscissa indicates that the H-S outcome magnitude was great...

Expected value of the high-uncertainty choice as a function of the probability of receiving 0 pellets (P[0]) or 1 pellet (P[1]) following a high-uncertainty choice in the high-uncertainty probability training procedure of Experiment 3A.

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

Expected value of the high-uncertainty choice as a function of the probability of receiving 0 pel...

A: Zero-order correlation between the mean log odds of high-uncertainty choices across probabilities of the P[0] condition (abscissa) and the difference score in the log odds of high-uncertainty choices following high-uncertainty-zero (H-Z) outcomes relative to high-uncertainty-small (H-S) outcomes (ordinate).

Andrew T. Marshall (689600)
Kimberly Kirkpatrick (689601)

February 2015

Here, post H-Z high-uncertainty choice behavior was subtracted from post H-S high-uncertainty cho...

Log-Ratios Comparing Probability of Visiting a Choice Alternative Given Time Spent Away From That Option, Relative To Overall Probability of Choice

Greg Jensen (712648)

July 2018

Log-ratios comparing the probability of making a choice after t trials of not having made tha...

Proportional odds model examining the impact of seeing uncertainty in the initial recommendation on accepting that recommendation.

Hannah Mendoza (14259118)
Lucy D’Agostino McGowan (4993355)

December 2022

Proportional odds model examining the impact of seeing uncertainty in the initial recommendation on ...

Results of Experiment 2.

Penelope Lacombe (14259360)
Sarah Brocard (14259363)
Klaus Zuberbühler (42992)
Christoph D. Dahl (14259366)

December 2022

Mean percentage of trials where subjects selected the risky option according to the value of the ris...

Mean (±SEM) log odds of high-uncertainty choices for each group in Experiment 2 as a function of the probability of high-uncertainty food delivery (A) and the expected value of a high-uncertainty outcome (B).

Abstract

Extracted data

Mean (±SEM) log odds of high-uncertainty choices for each group in Experiment 2 as a function of the probability of high-uncertainty food delivery (A) and the expected value of a high-uncertainty outcome (B).

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items