<p>Average spot intensity for spots B, D, and H, which showed an overall training effect. SP (sedentary-placebo), SE (sedentary-ESA), TP (training-placebo), and TE (training-ESA). The dark grey box at the bottom indicates the boosting period (first 3 weeks) and the light grey box the maintenance period (weeks 4–10), subjects were not treated during weeks 11–13 (wash-out phase). Data are expressed as mean ± SE, level of significance are p<0.05. * significant from SP within same time-point, # significant from different time-point within group (time point are given), ¤ significant from SE within same time-point.</p
<p>White squares indicate pre training (PRE) values and black squares post-training (POST) values. V...
<p>Panel A depicts a decrease around S2 (300–800 ms after S1, dashed rectangles) before vs. after tr...
<p>Non-significant increases were seen in average, peak power output and subject rating of perceived...
<p>A total of six spots changed significantly in relation to Darbepoietin-α treatment alone, two gra...
<p>Shows the mean (±90% CL) percentage change in performance and physiological measures from baselin...
<p>A: Weekly training time (h) distributed into endurance training (zones 1–5), strength and sprints...
<p>Peak power output (W) in the three groups before and after the 4-week training intervention.</p
<p>*p<0.001 versus pre-training (main effect for time). Lines denote individual data for 7 subjects ...
<p>Values are mean ± SD and represent training hours per week in different phases. A non-parametric ...
It has been proposed that the maintenance of acute hormonal responses reveal an efficacy of a traini...
Introduction: Periodization is the accurate manipulation of methodological variables of strength tra...
<p>A non-significant decrease in time to peak desaturation was found post training; P = 0.07, ES = 0...
<p>Beta value (activity estimates ± SE) in pre- and post-training sessions for single-task (visual d...
<p>OP = optimum power group; TT = traditional training group; T1 = pre-intervention evaluation; T2 =...
<p>a p<0.01,</p><p>b p<0.05, compared with pre-intervention value, within group.</p><p>c p<0.01, pre...
<p>White squares indicate pre training (PRE) values and black squares post-training (POST) values. V...
<p>Panel A depicts a decrease around S2 (300–800 ms after S1, dashed rectangles) before vs. after tr...
<p>Non-significant increases were seen in average, peak power output and subject rating of perceived...
<p>A total of six spots changed significantly in relation to Darbepoietin-α treatment alone, two gra...
<p>Shows the mean (±90% CL) percentage change in performance and physiological measures from baselin...
<p>A: Weekly training time (h) distributed into endurance training (zones 1–5), strength and sprints...
<p>Peak power output (W) in the three groups before and after the 4-week training intervention.</p
<p>*p<0.001 versus pre-training (main effect for time). Lines denote individual data for 7 subjects ...
<p>Values are mean ± SD and represent training hours per week in different phases. A non-parametric ...
It has been proposed that the maintenance of acute hormonal responses reveal an efficacy of a traini...
Introduction: Periodization is the accurate manipulation of methodological variables of strength tra...
<p>A non-significant decrease in time to peak desaturation was found post training; P = 0.07, ES = 0...
<p>Beta value (activity estimates ± SE) in pre- and post-training sessions for single-task (visual d...
<p>OP = optimum power group; TT = traditional training group; T1 = pre-intervention evaluation; T2 =...
<p>a p<0.01,</p><p>b p<0.05, compared with pre-intervention value, within group.</p><p>c p<0.01, pre...
<p>White squares indicate pre training (PRE) values and black squares post-training (POST) values. V...
<p>Panel A depicts a decrease around S2 (300–800 ms after S1, dashed rectangles) before vs. after tr...
<p>Non-significant increases were seen in average, peak power output and subject rating of perceived...