<p>The last row shows the total number of ranking points across all datasets and two classifiers (NBC and KNN) and in parenthesis the final rank position, while in the square brackets the average rank position.</p><p>Sum of ranking points for every method, for every performance metric across all datasets and different classification techniques.</p
<p>Statistics of the top miRNA entries in the ranking list with respect to their origins.</p
<p>Rank correlation coefficients among rankings of pathways identified by our four approaches.</p
<p>Top: Results of several metrics with all paradigms averaged, for the different number of trials u...
<p>General method ranking, obtained by sorting methods according to their average ranking across 6 d...
<p>The number in the parenthesis corresponds to the average rank of the algorithm among different su...
<p>Ranking of each method, as determined by statistical analysis, by individual sample type and comb...
<p>Summed ranking values were calculated from <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.13...
<p>Overall scoring of methods for the Datasets (one plus equals one point; the more, the better).</p
Summary of the methods included in this benchmark study in alphabetical order.</p
Partial and overall ranks of all estimation methods for various combinations of Θ.</p
<p>The number of subjects in binary task was 12 and the number of subjects in multi-task BCIs was 9....
Rankings of the top-performing data sources in different basins and time intervals of aggregation.</...
<p>Percentage of parameter configurations where the classifier in row had an higher accuracy than t...
<p>Classification results of three methods (%). The highest results of each method are shown in bold...
<p>Ranks of All Classification Methods Used in This Study in Ten Cross-Validation Experiments</p
<p>Statistics of the top miRNA entries in the ranking list with respect to their origins.</p
<p>Rank correlation coefficients among rankings of pathways identified by our four approaches.</p
<p>Top: Results of several metrics with all paradigms averaged, for the different number of trials u...
<p>General method ranking, obtained by sorting methods according to their average ranking across 6 d...
<p>The number in the parenthesis corresponds to the average rank of the algorithm among different su...
<p>Ranking of each method, as determined by statistical analysis, by individual sample type and comb...
<p>Summed ranking values were calculated from <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.13...
<p>Overall scoring of methods for the Datasets (one plus equals one point; the more, the better).</p
Summary of the methods included in this benchmark study in alphabetical order.</p
Partial and overall ranks of all estimation methods for various combinations of Θ.</p
<p>The number of subjects in binary task was 12 and the number of subjects in multi-task BCIs was 9....
Rankings of the top-performing data sources in different basins and time intervals of aggregation.</...
<p>Percentage of parameter configurations where the classifier in row had an higher accuracy than t...
<p>Classification results of three methods (%). The highest results of each method are shown in bold...
<p>Ranks of All Classification Methods Used in This Study in Ten Cross-Validation Experiments</p
<p>Statistics of the top miRNA entries in the ranking list with respect to their origins.</p
<p>Rank correlation coefficients among rankings of pathways identified by our four approaches.</p
<p>Top: Results of several metrics with all paradigms averaged, for the different number of trials u...