<p>The symbol “1”, “−”, or “0” means that the proposed scheme statistically (with 95% confidence) better, indistinguishable, or worse than the corresponding scheme.</p><p>Performance comparison based on statistical significance.</p
<p>The entries in cells indicate that the two systems are significantly different in F-scores. CD ha...
<p>Comparison of the optimized label and two designs based on current commercial practice for probab...
<p>Performance comparison and relative gain of the proposed scheme over the existing schemes.</p
Comparison of accuracy for different approaches, where small value indicates good performance and bo...
<p>The prefix ’A’ denotes the use of age as a kernel matrix. (CC: Correlation Coefficient; RMSE: Roo...
<p>Statistical comparison of AOR for video sequences, where the bold fonts indicate those with the b...
Performance comparison: Numbers of true positive and false positive, precision, and recall of SNVs/i...
<p>Summary of the comparison. Boldface indicates significantly better performance than the other met...
<p>A comparison between our method and PRINCE. We can see that our method gives a high precision as ...
Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p
The average performance comparison of the proposed scheme with other schemes for different values of...
Comparison of the WR of different trading algorithms in the different industries of CSICS. Best perf...
Pairwise comparisons, according to the Wilcoxon test, for the experiments run in this work (left) an...
<p>Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...
<p>Performance comparison between the second on the list and the first and last on the list, by gend...
<p>The entries in cells indicate that the two systems are significantly different in F-scores. CD ha...
<p>Comparison of the optimized label and two designs based on current commercial practice for probab...
<p>Performance comparison and relative gain of the proposed scheme over the existing schemes.</p
Comparison of accuracy for different approaches, where small value indicates good performance and bo...
<p>The prefix ’A’ denotes the use of age as a kernel matrix. (CC: Correlation Coefficient; RMSE: Roo...
<p>Statistical comparison of AOR for video sequences, where the bold fonts indicate those with the b...
Performance comparison: Numbers of true positive and false positive, precision, and recall of SNVs/i...
<p>Summary of the comparison. Boldface indicates significantly better performance than the other met...
<p>A comparison between our method and PRINCE. We can see that our method gives a high precision as ...
Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p
The average performance comparison of the proposed scheme with other schemes for different values of...
Comparison of the WR of different trading algorithms in the different industries of CSICS. Best perf...
Pairwise comparisons, according to the Wilcoxon test, for the experiments run in this work (left) an...
<p>Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...
<p>Performance comparison between the second on the list and the first and last on the list, by gend...
<p>The entries in cells indicate that the two systems are significantly different in F-scores. CD ha...
<p>Comparison of the optimized label and two designs based on current commercial practice for probab...
<p>Performance comparison and relative gain of the proposed scheme over the existing schemes.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG