<p>In the typical frequency band, detailed information for clusters showing group ALFF differences at the given threshold (<i>p</i> < 0.05, AlphaSim corrected).</p
<p>FC and ALFF values were averaged in the significant clusters resulting from t-contrast HC vs AD i...
<p>Number of sensors with significant differences (p<0.01; in brackets: p<0.05 corrected) between gr...
<p>Thresholds are plotted as a function of band center frequency for targets spanning two octave-wid...
<p>a) Mean ALFF map of session 1, b) mean ALFF map of session 2, c) ALFF distribution map of session...
<p>The mean zALFF maps were calculated from 10 subjects using RS1, RS2 and RS3 datasets at the frequ...
<p>The effects are significant at <i>p</i> < 0.05, FDR corrected; ≥100 contiguous voxels for one sam...
<p>The differences map from the bottom to the top, (every 12 mm), (p<0.01, corrected, T>2.7633 or <−...
<p>The one-sample <i>t</i>-test results shown in A and B in the upper row were generated from 21 sub...
<p>The ICC maps for ALFF calculated from 10 subjects using RS1, RS2 and RS3 datasets at the frequenc...
<p>Source level clustering coefficients increase in the upper alpha band in the NE-IL relative to th...
<p>The warm color represents increased ALFF in stuttering subjects, and the blue color represents de...
<p>The frequencies below 0.05 and around 0.20 Hz contain most discriminative information.</p
<p>Source level clustering coefficients increase in the upper alpha band in the WE-IL relative to th...
<p>Results were presented (<b><i>A</i></b>) in 18 frequency bins with the same size of 0.02 Hz from ...
<p>Frequency of Fb/MFb transdifferentiation in groups A and B before and after DSAEK.</p
<p>FC and ALFF values were averaged in the significant clusters resulting from t-contrast HC vs AD i...
<p>Number of sensors with significant differences (p<0.01; in brackets: p<0.05 corrected) between gr...
<p>Thresholds are plotted as a function of band center frequency for targets spanning two octave-wid...
<p>a) Mean ALFF map of session 1, b) mean ALFF map of session 2, c) ALFF distribution map of session...
<p>The mean zALFF maps were calculated from 10 subjects using RS1, RS2 and RS3 datasets at the frequ...
<p>The effects are significant at <i>p</i> < 0.05, FDR corrected; ≥100 contiguous voxels for one sam...
<p>The differences map from the bottom to the top, (every 12 mm), (p<0.01, corrected, T>2.7633 or <−...
<p>The one-sample <i>t</i>-test results shown in A and B in the upper row were generated from 21 sub...
<p>The ICC maps for ALFF calculated from 10 subjects using RS1, RS2 and RS3 datasets at the frequenc...
<p>Source level clustering coefficients increase in the upper alpha band in the NE-IL relative to th...
<p>The warm color represents increased ALFF in stuttering subjects, and the blue color represents de...
<p>The frequencies below 0.05 and around 0.20 Hz contain most discriminative information.</p
<p>Source level clustering coefficients increase in the upper alpha band in the WE-IL relative to th...
<p>Results were presented (<b><i>A</i></b>) in 18 frequency bins with the same size of 0.02 Hz from ...
<p>Frequency of Fb/MFb transdifferentiation in groups A and B before and after DSAEK.</p
<p>FC and ALFF values were averaged in the significant clusters resulting from t-contrast HC vs AD i...
<p>Number of sensors with significant differences (p<0.01; in brackets: p<0.05 corrected) between gr...
<p>Thresholds are plotted as a function of band center frequency for targets spanning two octave-wid...