<p>2A: Changes in gene expression estimated by microarray. 2B: Changes in gene expression estimated by Nanostring. 2C: Comparison between microarray estimate and Nanostring shown on a coordinate plot. Pearson correlation coefficient, pre-D/Control = 0.98, post-D/Control = 0.92.</p
<p>Pearson Correlation Scores for Individual Sample Groups Between NanoString and Microarray (p-valu...
<p>Log-transformed (in base 10) fold change values of the Q-PCR data (y-axis) were plotted against t...
<p>(A) Correlation of signal intensity of saline treated 9V/null tissues in microarray platform with...
<p>Nanostring correlation for (A) undegraded RNA against the same manually degraded sample (RIN=2.0)...
<p>22 Genes are listed in descending order from greatest up-regulated to greatest down-regulated.The...
<p>A comparison of the expression levels obtained from the RNAseq data to those previously reported ...
<p>NA- not available</p><p>A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.67 was obtained when comparing the...
(A) Thirty-two genes were selected from the gene expression profile of the 20 mm region that were in...
1<p>Only data for Control sample listed here – all data included in Supplemental Materials.</p>2<p>s...
<p>Eighteen human reference gene mRNAs were quantified using NanoString technology in unfixed and fi...
<p>(A) The average number of hits (log2(x+1)) for each gene are plotted on the y-axis and the corres...
<p>The x-axis represents individual genes and the y-axis fold-change in expression by either microar...
<p>Correlations of log2 fold-change between RNA-seq FPKM and Nanostring gene count.</p
<p>The expression of six differentially expressed gene transcripts was validated by microfluidic-bas...
<p>The expression of 19 genes from five time points relative to SD-long term comparing results using...
<p>Pearson Correlation Scores for Individual Sample Groups Between NanoString and Microarray (p-valu...
<p>Log-transformed (in base 10) fold change values of the Q-PCR data (y-axis) were plotted against t...
<p>(A) Correlation of signal intensity of saline treated 9V/null tissues in microarray platform with...
<p>Nanostring correlation for (A) undegraded RNA against the same manually degraded sample (RIN=2.0)...
<p>22 Genes are listed in descending order from greatest up-regulated to greatest down-regulated.The...
<p>A comparison of the expression levels obtained from the RNAseq data to those previously reported ...
<p>NA- not available</p><p>A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.67 was obtained when comparing the...
(A) Thirty-two genes were selected from the gene expression profile of the 20 mm region that were in...
1<p>Only data for Control sample listed here – all data included in Supplemental Materials.</p>2<p>s...
<p>Eighteen human reference gene mRNAs were quantified using NanoString technology in unfixed and fi...
<p>(A) The average number of hits (log2(x+1)) for each gene are plotted on the y-axis and the corres...
<p>The x-axis represents individual genes and the y-axis fold-change in expression by either microar...
<p>Correlations of log2 fold-change between RNA-seq FPKM and Nanostring gene count.</p
<p>The expression of six differentially expressed gene transcripts was validated by microfluidic-bas...
<p>The expression of 19 genes from five time points relative to SD-long term comparing results using...
<p>Pearson Correlation Scores for Individual Sample Groups Between NanoString and Microarray (p-valu...
<p>Log-transformed (in base 10) fold change values of the Q-PCR data (y-axis) were plotted against t...
<p>(A) Correlation of signal intensity of saline treated 9V/null tissues in microarray platform with...